John F. Bell

8.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
68 papers, 6.9k citations indexed

About

John F. Bell is a scholar working on Education, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Management Science and Operations Research. According to data from OpenAlex, John F. Bell has authored 68 papers receiving a total of 6.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 12 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 8 papers in Management Science and Operations Research. Recurrent topics in John F. Bell's work include Forest ecology and management (11 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (6 papers). John F. Bell is often cited by papers focused on Forest ecology and management (11 papers), Forest Management and Policy (7 papers) and Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications (6 papers). John F. Bell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and India. John F. Bell's co-authors include Alan H. Fielding, Herbert Goldstein, Sandra Daniels, J L Emery, R. W. Farebrother, David D. Marshall, Jackie Greatorex, Sandra Johnson, Jo‐Anne Baird and Carmen L. Vidal Rodeiro and has published in prestigious journals such as Hypertension, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association and Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

John F. Bell

61 papers receiving 6.4k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models

1997 5.6k citations John F. Bell et al. profile →

Peers

John F. Bell

EM

ECOLO

NLC

GPC

EEBS

Rick Bonney United States

Janis L. Dickinson United States

Alan H. Fielding United Kingdom

Kenneth V. Rosenberg United States

Steve Kelling United States

Caren B. Cooper United States

Tina Phillips United States

Patrick E. Osborne United Kingdom

Janneke HilleRisLambers United States

Carsten M. Buchmann Germany

Rick Bonney United States

John F. Bell

5.3k ×1.5

EM

2.9k ×0.9

ECOLO

1.3k ×0.5

NLC

1.3k ×1.1

GPC

1.1k ×1.0

EEBS

Citations per year, relative to John F. Bell John F. Bell (= 1×) peers Rick Bonney

Countries citing papers authored by John F. Bell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John F. Bell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John F. Bell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John F. Bell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John F. Bell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John F. Bell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John F. Bell. The network helps show where John F. Bell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John F. Bell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John F. Bell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John F. Bell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John F. Bell. John F. Bell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Bell, John F.. (2015). Race, Power, and Education in Early America. The Mathematics Enthusiast. 2(1). 4. 1 indexed citations

2.

Anderson, R. B., R. V. Morris, S. M. Clegg, et al.. (2010). Partial Least Squares and Neural Networks for Quantitative Calibration of Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy (LIBs) of Geologic Samples. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 2013. 1 indexed citations

3.

Emery, J L, John F. Bell, & Carmen L. Vidal Rodeiro. (2010). The BioMedical Admissions Test for medical student selection: Issues of fairness and bias. Medical Teacher. 33(1). 62–71. 21 indexed citations

4.

Emery, J L & John F. Bell. (2009). The predictive validity of the BioMedical Admissions Test for pre‐clinical examination performance. Medical Education. 43(6). 557–564. 47 indexed citations

5.

Johnson, Martin, et al.. (2009). Marking essays on screen: An investigation into the reliability of marking extended subjective texts. British Journal of Educational Technology. 41(5). 814–826. 23 indexed citations

6.

Bell, John F., N. W. Offer, & David J. Roberts. (2006). The effect on dairy cow performance of adding molassed sugar beet feed to immature forage maize at ensiling or prior to feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 137(1-2). 84–92. 3 indexed citations

7.

Bell, John F., et al.. (2005). The changing pattern of A level/AS uptake in England. The Curriculum Journal. 16(3). 391–400. 11 indexed citations

8.

Baird, Jo‐Anne, Jackie Greatorex, & John F. Bell. (2004). What makes marking reliable? Experiments with UK examinations. Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice. 11(3). 331–348. 48 indexed citations

9.

Marshall, David D., et al.. (2004). Using a large-angle gauge to select trees for measurement in variable plot sampling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 34(4). 840–845. 36 indexed citations

10.

Bell, John F., et al.. (2001). Patterns of uptake of modern foreign language examinations in England 1984 to 1999. Language Learning Journal. 24(1). 48–52. 4 indexed citations

11.

Bell, John F., et al.. (1998). Assessing changes over time using Thurstone paired comparisons [Comparing changes in examination scores]. 25(2). 1. 18 indexed citations

12.

Curtis, Robert O., David D. Marshall, & John F. Bell. (1997). LOGS: A Pioneering Example of Silvicultural Research in Coast Douglas-Fir. Journal of Forestry. 95(7). 19–25. 32 indexed citations

13.

Bell, John F., David Magnusson, & Lars R. Bergman. (1992). Data Quality on Longitudinal Research.. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician). 41(2). 248–248. 4 indexed citations

14.

Bell, John F.. (1990). The Curriculum for English 15‐year‐old Pupils in 1984. Was There a Common Core of Subjects?. British Educational Research Journal. 16(1). 41–52. 2 indexed citations

15.

Johnson, Sandra & John F. Bell. (1987). Gender Differences in Science: Option Choices.. School science review. 69(247). 17 indexed citations

16.

Bell, John F.. (1985). Generalizability Theory: The Software Problem. Journal of Educational Statistics. 10(1). 19–29. 14 indexed citations

17.

Johnson, Sandra & John F. Bell. (1985). EVALUATING AND PREDICTING SURVEY EFFICIENCY USING GENERALIZABILITY THEORY. Journal of Educational Measurement. 22(2). 107–119. 18 indexed citations

18.

Bell, John F.. (1985). Generalizability Theory: The Software Problem. Journal of Educational Statistics. 10(1). 19–19. 3 indexed citations

19.

Smith, Stephen H. & John F. Bell. (1983). Using Competitive Stress Index to Estimate Diameter Growth for Thinned Douglas-fir Stands. Forest Science. 29(3). 491–499. 12 indexed citations

20.

Bell, John F., David D. Marshall, & Gregory P. Johnson. (1981). Tarif tables for mountain hemlock developed from an equation of total stem cubic-foot volume. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact