Martin Eden
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 1%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Emergency Medical Services top 2%
- Co-authors
- Karen HassellEllen SchafheutleAnthony AveryRachel ElliottMatthew FranklinKoen PutmanAziz SheikhSarah Rodgers
- Topics
- Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers)Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Martin Eden
33 papers receiving 877 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- General Health Professions 365
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 317
- Economics and Econometrics 162
- Epidemiology 133
- Emergency Medical Services 131
Countries citing papers authored by Martin Eden
This map shows the geographic impact of Martin Eden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Martin Eden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Martin Eden more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Martin Eden
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Martin Eden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Martin Eden. The network helps show where Martin Eden may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Martin Eden
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Martin Eden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Martin Eden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Martin Eden. Martin Eden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 34 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 182 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 51 | |
| 19 | Why some pharmacists choose non-standard careers soon after qualifying? | 1 |
| 20 | Workforce update - joiners, leavers, and practising and non-practising pharmacists on the 2005 Register | 32 |
About Martin Eden
Martin Eden is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Emergency Medical Services and Family Practice, having authored 35 papers that have together received 906 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (9 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (317 citations), Family Practice (66 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (131 citations). Martin Eden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Karen Hassell, Ellen Schafheutle, Anthony Avery, Rachel Elliott, Matthew Franklin, Koen Putman, Aziz Sheikh, Sarah Rodgers, R.J. Prescott and Katherine Payne. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, BMJ and British Journal of Dermatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.