Sarah Rodgers

1.7k total citations
42 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Sarah Rodgers is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, General Health Professions and Emergency Medical Services. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Rodgers has authored 42 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Geriatrics and Gerontology, 10 papers in General Health Professions and 10 papers in Emergency Medical Services. Recurrent topics in Sarah Rodgers's work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (16 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (9 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). Sarah Rodgers is often cited by papers focused on Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (16 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (9 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers). Sarah Rodgers collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Sarah Rodgers's co-authors include Anthony Avery, David Magnus, Aziz Sheikh, J A Cantrill, Kathrin Cresswell, Rachel Elliott, Rachel Howard, Caroline Morris, Sarah Armstrong and Darren M. Ashcroft and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, BMJ and PLoS Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Rodgers

41 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Rodgers United Kingdom 18 508 327 217 205 190 42 1.2k
Janice L. Kwan Canada 17 365 0.7× 419 1.3× 222 1.0× 170 0.8× 239 1.3× 39 1.6k
Carlton Moore United States 15 244 0.5× 415 1.3× 207 1.0× 182 0.9× 171 0.9× 50 1.4k
Cynthia Barnard United States 16 339 0.7× 339 1.0× 454 2.1× 247 1.2× 126 0.7× 57 1.3k
Lakshmi Halasyamani United States 20 226 0.4× 417 1.3× 221 1.0× 245 1.2× 85 0.4× 37 1.9k
Matthew Boyd United Kingdom 21 502 1.0× 336 1.0× 215 1.0× 157 0.8× 84 0.4× 58 1.1k
David T. Liss United States 23 327 0.6× 618 1.9× 224 1.0× 261 1.3× 158 0.8× 70 1.8k
Luke O. Hansen United States 10 368 0.7× 625 1.9× 182 0.8× 241 1.2× 67 0.4× 14 1.6k
Amanda H. Salanitro United States 14 429 0.8× 606 1.9× 125 0.6× 271 1.3× 141 0.7× 24 1.8k
Joshua M. Pevnick United States 16 343 0.7× 242 0.7× 132 0.6× 126 0.6× 142 0.7× 46 977
Lisha Lo Canada 8 335 0.7× 328 1.0× 208 1.0× 117 0.6× 217 1.1× 18 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Rodgers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Rodgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Rodgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Rodgers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Rodgers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Rodgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Rodgers. The network helps show where Sarah Rodgers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Rodgers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Rodgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Rodgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Rodgers. Sarah Rodgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Rodgers, Sarah, Stephen A. Roberts, Thomas Allen, et al.. (2022). Scaling-up a pharmacist-led information technology intervention (PINCER) to reduce hazardous prescribing in general practices: Multiple interrupted time series study. PLoS Medicine. 19(11). e1004133–e1004133. 8 indexed citations
3.
Best, Kate, Sarah Alderson, David P Alldred, et al.. (2022). 825 DEVELOPMENT OF THE ANTICHOLINERGIC MEDICATION INDEX (ACMI). Age and Ageing. 51(Supplement_1). 1 indexed citations
4.
Rodgers, Sarah, et al.. (2021). Using chart online comparative analysis service to support the national rollout of PINCER. Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham). 1 indexed citations
6.
Laird, Yvonne, Ruth F. Hunter, John McAteer, et al.. (2020). Stakeholders’ experiences of the public health research process: time to change the system?. Health Research Policy and Systems. 18(1). 83–83. 21 indexed citations
7.
Spencer, Rachel, Sarah Rodgers, Nde-Eshimuni Salema, Stephen Campbell, & Anthony Avery. (2019). Processing discharge summaries in general practice: a qualitative interview study with GPs and practice managers. BJGP Open. 3(1). bjgpopen18X101625–bjgpopen18X101625. 20 indexed citations
8.
Burt, Jenni, Natasha Elmore, Stephen Campbell, et al.. (2018). Developing a measure of polypharmacy appropriateness in primary care: systematic review and expert consensus study. BMC Medicine. 16(1). 91–91. 38 indexed citations
9.
Spencer, Rachel, Simon E. F. Spencer, Sarah Rodgers, Stephen Campbell, & Anthony Avery. (2018). Processing of discharge summaries in general practice: a retrospective record review. British Journal of General Practice. 68(673). e576–e585. 26 indexed citations
10.
Bell, Brian, Stephen Campbell, Andrew Carson‐Stevens, et al.. (2017). Understanding the epidemiology of avoidable significant harm in primary care: protocol for a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 7(2). e013786–e013786. 12 indexed citations
11.
Jeffries, Mark, Denham L. Phipps, Rachel L. Howard, et al.. (2017). Understanding the implementation and adoption of a technological intervention to improve medication safety in primary care: a realist evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 17(1). 196–196. 23 indexed citations
12.
Jeffries, Mark, Denham L. Phipps, Rachel L. Howard, et al.. (2017). Understanding the implementation and adoption of an information technology intervention to support medicine optimisation in primary care: qualitative study using strong structuration theory. BMJ Open. 7(5). e014810–e014810. 21 indexed citations
13.
Akbarov, Artur, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Matthew Sperrin, et al.. (2015). Primary Care Medication Safety Surveillance with Integrated Primary and Secondary Care Electronic Health Records: A Cross-Sectional Study. Drug Safety. 38(7). 671–682. 33 indexed citations
14.
Stocks, Susan Jill, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Artur Akbarov, et al.. (2015). Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: cross sectional study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BMJ. 351. h5501–h5501. 50 indexed citations
15.
Kempe, Allison, Matthew F. Daley, Jennifer Pyrzanowski, et al.. (2014). School-Located Influenza Vaccination With Third-Party Billing: Outcomes, Cost, and Reimbursement. Academic Pediatrics. 14(3). 234–240. 14 indexed citations
16.
Rodgers, Sarah, et al.. (2013). Treatment of lower extremity oedema by subcutaneous drainage in a home hospice patient. BMJ Case Reports. 2013(apr29 1). bcr2013009787–bcr2013009787. 2 indexed citations
19.
Hammersley, Vicky, Caroline Morris, Sarah Rodgers, J A Cantrill, & Anthony Avery. (2006). Applying preventable drug-related morbidity indicators to the electronic patient record in UK primary care: methodological development. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 31(3). 223–229. 8 indexed citations
20.
Rodgers, Sarah, Anthony Avery, David Meechan, et al.. (1999). Controlled trial of pharmacist intervention in general practice: the effect on prescribing costs.. PubMed. 49(446). 717–20. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026