Sarah Cotterill

2.4k total citations
90 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Sarah Cotterill is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Pharmacy. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Cotterill has authored 90 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in General Health Professions, 21 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and 11 papers in Pharmacy. Recurrent topics in Sarah Cotterill's work include Diabetes Management and Education (21 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (14 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers). Sarah Cotterill is often cited by papers focused on Diabetes Management and Education (21 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (14 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (11 papers). Sarah Cotterill collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Sarah Cotterill's co-authors include Peter John, Stephen F. King, Nia Coupe, Liz Richardson, Peter Bower, Sarah Peters, David French, Hisako Nomura, Jack S. Benton and Corinne Wales and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Cotterill

83 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Cotterill United Kingdom 22 396 183 172 161 134 90 1.4k
Chris L. S. Coryn United States 20 537 1.4× 347 1.9× 77 0.4× 114 0.7× 54 0.4× 64 1.8k
Sarah Moreland‐Russell United States 19 751 1.9× 229 1.3× 111 0.6× 301 1.9× 30 0.2× 56 1.6k
Annette Roberts United Kingdom 20 123 0.3× 344 1.9× 52 0.3× 95 0.6× 49 0.4× 66 1.5k
Lisa K. Staten United States 19 618 1.6× 213 1.2× 75 0.4× 577 3.6× 27 0.2× 45 1.7k
So Young Kim South Korea 25 415 1.0× 332 1.8× 54 0.3× 508 3.2× 35 0.3× 104 1.8k
Hans van Oers Netherlands 31 1.2k 3.1× 284 1.6× 153 0.9× 554 3.4× 37 0.3× 178 3.1k
Simon Briscoe United Kingdom 21 552 1.4× 198 1.1× 25 0.1× 259 1.6× 50 0.4× 68 1.9k
Melissa DeJonckheere United States 18 498 1.3× 287 1.6× 120 0.7× 296 1.8× 18 0.1× 74 2.0k
Cornelia Guell United Kingdom 23 331 0.8× 129 0.7× 99 0.6× 370 2.3× 8 0.1× 77 1.5k
Thorsten Kneip Germany 9 628 1.6× 483 2.6× 18 0.1× 124 0.8× 61 0.5× 20 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Cotterill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Cotterill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Cotterill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Cotterill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Cotterill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Cotterill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Cotterill. The network helps show where Sarah Cotterill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Cotterill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Cotterill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Cotterill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Cotterill. Sarah Cotterill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bowen, Audrey, et al.. (2025). An online, group Acceptance and Commitment Therapy is acceptable to stroke survivors: A qualitative interview study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 35(9). 1865–1883.
4.
Bower, Peter, Simon Heller, Paul Wilson, et al.. (2023). Diabetes prevention at scale: Narrative review of findings and lessons from the DIPLOMA evaluation of the NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme in England. Diabetic Medicine. 40(11). e15209–e15209. 3 indexed citations
6.
Ross, Jamie, Sarah Cotterill, Peter Bower, & Elizabeth Murray. (2023). Influences on Patient Uptake of and Engagement With the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Qualitative Interview Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 25. e40961–e40961. 11 indexed citations
7.
Hawkes, Rhiannon E, Lisa M Miles, Peter Bower, Sarah Cotterill, & David French. (2022). Assessing and ensuring fidelity of the nationally implemented English NHS diabetes prevention programme: lessons learned for the implementation of large-scale behaviour change programmes. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. 10(1). 498–513. 13 indexed citations
9.
Benton, Jack S., Sarah Cotterill, Rhiannon E Hawkes, Lisa M Miles, & David French. (2022). Changes in a Digital Type 2 Diabetes Self-management Intervention During National Rollout: Mixed Methods Study of Fidelity. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 24(12). e39483–e39483. 5 indexed citations
10.
Bowen, Audrey, et al.. (2021). Process and outcome measures used in acceptance and commitment therapy research, with adults with acquired neurological conditions: a systematic review. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1 indexed citations
11.
Benton, Jack S., Sarah Cotterill, Jamie Anderson, et al.. (2021). A natural experimental study of improvements along an urban canal: impact on canal usage, physical activity and other wellbeing behaviours. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 18(1). 19–19. 22 indexed citations
12.
Benton, Jack S., Sarah Cotterill, Jamie Anderson, et al.. (2021). Impact of a low-cost urban green space intervention on wellbeing behaviours in older adults: A natural experimental study. Wellbeing Space and Society. 2. 100029–100029. 22 indexed citations
14.
Howarth, Elizabeth, Peter Bower, Evangelos Kontopantelis, et al.. (2020). ‘Going the distance’: an independent cohort study of engagement and dropout among the first 100 000 referrals into a large-scale diabetes prevention program. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care. 8(2). e001835–e001835. 37 indexed citations
15.
Cotterill, Sarah, et al.. (2019). “I Would Never Come Here Because I’ve Got My Own Garden”: Older Adults’ Perceptions of Small Urban Green Spaces. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(11). 1994–1994. 38 indexed citations
16.
Cotterill, Sarah, Sarah Knowles, Anne‐Marie Martindale, et al.. (2018). Getting messier with TIDieR: embracing context and complexity in intervention reporting. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 18(1). 12–12. 101 indexed citations
18.
Dennis, Matthew, David French, Jack S. Benton, Sarah Cotterill, & Jamie Anderson. (2018). The impact of new walking infrastructure and changes to green space along an urban canal on physical activity and wellbeing: protocol for a natural experimental study. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1 indexed citations
19.
Kenney, Laurence, et al.. (2018). Prediction of setup times for an advanced upper limb functional electrical stimulation system. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. 5. 2481656449–2481656449. 3 indexed citations
20.
Cotterill, Sarah, Kelly Howells, Sarah Rhodes, & Peter Bower. (2017). The effect of using social pressure in cover letters to improve retention in a longitudinal health study: an embedded randomised controlled retention trial. Trials. 18(1). 341–341. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026