Stuart Wright

711 total citations
41 papers, 453 citations indexed

About

Stuart Wright is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Wright has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 453 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 10 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 8 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Stuart Wright's work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (19 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers). Stuart Wright is often cited by papers focused on Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (19 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (10 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers). Stuart Wright collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Stuart Wright's co-authors include Katherine Payne, Sean P. Gavan, Alexander Thompson, Caroline Vass, Michael Burton, Joseph Mugisha, Janet Seeley, Fiona Ulph, William G. Newman and Flavia Zalwango and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Nature Reviews Genetics and British Journal of Dermatology.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Wright

35 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart Wright United Kingdom 12 167 99 87 77 72 41 453
Karina Jackson United Kingdom 14 151 0.9× 45 0.5× 75 0.9× 23 0.3× 44 0.6× 23 1.1k
Lívia Lovato Pires de Lemos Brazil 11 62 0.4× 188 1.9× 27 0.3× 40 0.5× 92 1.3× 23 535
Sheela Upadhyaya United Kingdom 11 174 1.0× 82 0.8× 105 1.2× 49 0.6× 52 0.7× 24 446
Ulrik Kihlbom Sweden 14 83 0.5× 156 1.6× 87 1.0× 28 0.4× 151 2.1× 33 456
Edward C. Mansley United States 12 209 1.3× 88 0.9× 37 0.4× 14 0.2× 31 0.4× 24 465
Chiara Whichello United States 9 250 1.5× 141 1.4× 31 0.4× 20 0.3× 47 0.7× 25 432
Karen J. Maschke United States 12 82 0.5× 137 1.4× 36 0.4× 77 1.0× 245 3.4× 37 499
Jessica Risser United States 8 79 0.5× 148 1.5× 43 0.5× 21 0.3× 34 0.5× 8 776
Abhinav Bassi United Kingdom 9 90 0.5× 119 1.2× 34 0.4× 215 2.8× 77 1.1× 18 553
Khosro Keshavarz Iran 11 126 0.8× 60 0.6× 20 0.2× 22 0.3× 21 0.3× 65 440

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Wright. The network helps show where Stuart Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Wright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Wright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Wright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Wright. Stuart Wright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderson, A. W., Cristina Visintin, Antonis C. Antoniou, et al.. (2024). Risk stratification in breast screening workshop. BMC Proceedings. 18(S19). 22–22. 1 indexed citations
3.
McDermott, John, et al.. (2024). A review of clopidogrel resistance in lower extremity arterial disease. PubMed. 2. 100112–100112.
4.
Wright, Stuart, et al.. (2024). A structured process for the validation of a decision-analytic model: application to a cost-effectiveness model for risk-stratified national breast screening. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 22(4). 527–542. 1 indexed citations
5.
Wright, Stuart, et al.. (2023). A Discrete Choice Experiment of Older Self-Funders’ Preferences When Navigating Community Social Care. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2023. 1–12.
6.
Gavan, Sean P., Stuart Wright, Fiona Thistlethwaite, & Katherine Payne. (2023). Capturing the Impact of Constraints on the Cost-Effectiveness of Cell and Gene Therapies: A Systematic Review. PharmacoEconomics. 41(6). 675–692. 4 indexed citations
7.
McDermott, John, Stuart Wright, Videha Sharma, et al.. (2022). Characterizing pharmacogenetic programs using the consolidated framework for implementation research: A structured scoping review. Frontiers in Medicine. 9. 945352–945352. 20 indexed citations
8.
Shields, Gemma, Becky Pennington, Ash Bullement, Stuart Wright, & Jamie Elvidge. (2021). Out of Date or Best Before? A Commentary on the Relevance of Economic Evaluations Over Time. PharmacoEconomics. 40(3). 249–256. 3 indexed citations
9.
Wright, Stuart, et al.. (2021). Patient preferences for stratified medicine in psoriasis: a discrete choice experiment*. British Journal of Dermatology. 185(5). 978–987. 4 indexed citations
10.
Wright, Stuart, William G. Newman, & Katherine Payne. (2021). Quantifying the Impact of Capacity Constraints in Economic Evaluations: An Application in Precision Medicine. Medical Decision Making. 42(4). 538–553. 4 indexed citations
11.
Wright, Stuart, et al.. (2020). Prostate cancer survivors’ preferences on the delivery of diet and lifestyle advice: a pilot best-worst discrete choice experiment. Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 6(1). 6 indexed citations
12.
Wright, Stuart, et al.. (2019). The role of information provision in economic evaluations of non-invasive prenatal testing: a systematic review. The European Journal of Health Economics. 20(8). 1123–1131. 3 indexed citations
13.
Wright, Stuart, William G. Newman, & Katherine Payne. (2019). Accounting for Capacity Constraints in Economic Evaluations of Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review. PharmacoEconomics. 37(8). 1011–1027. 13 indexed citations
15.
Wright, Stuart, Debbie Gibson, Martin Eden, et al.. (2017). What are colorectal cancer survivors’ preferences for dietary advice? A best-worst discrete choice experiment. Journal of Cancer Survivorship. 11(6). 782–790. 17 indexed citations
16.
Wright, Stuart, et al.. (2017). Eliciting Preferences for Information Provision in Newborn Bloodspot Screening Programs. Value in Health. 20(4). 651–661. 17 indexed citations
17.
Chorney, Jill, et al.. (2016). Aromatherapy for the treatment of PONV in children: a pilot RCT. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 16(1). 450–450. 25 indexed citations
18.
Eden, Martin, Katherine Payne, Stuart Wright, et al.. (2016). Identifying variation in models of care for the genomic-based diagnosis of inherited retinal dystrophies in the United Kingdom. Eye. 30(7). 966–971. 3 indexed citations
19.
Wright, Stuart, et al.. (2012). Despondency Among HIV-Positive Older Men and Women in Uganda. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology. 27(4). 319–333. 29 indexed citations
20.
Wright, Stuart & Peter Mackereth. (1993). AIDS/HIV. Waking up to reality.. PubMed. 89(26). 32–3. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026