British Journal of Dermatology

19.3k papers and 578.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 19.3k papers published in British Journal of Dermatology in the last decades have received a total of 578.1k indexed citations. Papers published in British Journal of Dermatology usually cover Dermatology (9.1k papers), Epidemiology (4.1k papers) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (3.7k papers) specifically the topics of Dermatology and Skin Diseases (3.0k papers), Autoimmune Bullous Skin Diseases (2.7k papers) and Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Journal of Dermatology are A.Y. Finlay, C.E.M. Griffiths, Hywel C Williams, R. Marks, Martin M. Black, Sam Shuster, Roderick J. Hay, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, Alan Lyell and Brian Diffey.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in British Journal of Dermatology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in British Journal of Dermatology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Journal of Dermatology.

Countries where authors publish in British Journal of Dermatology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Journal of Dermatology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Journal of Dermatology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Journal of Dermatology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025