Thomas Blakeman
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 22
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 12
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 9
- Geriatrics and Gerontology top 2%
- Frailty in Older Adults 8
- Nephrology top 2%
- Family Practice top 5%
-
- Diabetes Management and Education 14
-
- Chronic Disease Management Strategies 38
-
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life 14
-
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 10
Thomas Blakeman
89 papers receiving 2.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
- General Health Professions 1.5k
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 210
- Nephrology 294
- Family Practice 75
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 530
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Blakeman
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Blakeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Blakeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Blakeman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Blakeman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Blakeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Blakeman. The network helps show where Thomas Blakeman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Blakeman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 13 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 111 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 62 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 95 | |
| 20 | . A qualitative study exploring the Quality and Outcomes Framework and self-management dialogue in primary care consultations | 2011 | 2 |
About Thomas Blakeman
Thomas Blakeman is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Nephrology, General Health Professions, Emergency Medicine and Epidemiology, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (38 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (22 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (14 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (14 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (10 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (9 papers) and Frailty in Older Adults (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.5k citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (210 citations), Nephrology (294 citations), Family Practice (75 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (530 citations). Thomas Blakeman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Peter Bower, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Anne Rogers, Anne Kennedy, Joanne Protheroe, David Reeves, Wendy Macdonald, Simon Fraser, Rebecca Morris and Caroline Gardner. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ Open, British Journal of General Practice, BMC Family Practice, Implementation Science and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.