Thomas Blakeman

4.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
96 papers, 2.7k citations indexed

About

Thomas Blakeman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas Blakeman has authored 96 papers receiving a total of 2.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 48 papers in General Health Professions, 39 papers in Epidemiology and 21 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Thomas Blakeman's work include Chronic Disease Management Strategies (38 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (22 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (14 papers). Thomas Blakeman is often cited by papers focused on Chronic Disease Management Strategies (38 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (22 papers) and Diabetes Management and Education (14 papers). Thomas Blakeman collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Qatar. Thomas Blakeman's co-authors include Peter Bower, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Anne Rogers, Anne Kennedy, Joanne Protheroe, David Reeves, Wendy Macdonald, Simon Fraser, Rebecca Morris and Caroline Gardner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Kidney International.

In The Last Decade

Thomas Blakeman

89 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT): a new theory for designing, implementing, and evaluating feedback in health care based on a systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative research

2019 195 citations Benjamin Brown, Thomas Blakeman et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Thomas Blakeman United Kingdom	29	1.5k	872	530	406	330	96	2.7k
O. Kenrik Duru United States	25	650 0.4×	412 0.5×	570 1.1×	374 0.9×	274 0.8×	110	2.2k
Kasey R. Boehmer United States	21	1.8k 1.2×	738 0.8×	544 1.0×	452 1.1×	559 1.7×	64	3.6k
Anne Frølich Denmark	26	824 0.6×	601 0.7×	257 0.5×	529 1.3×	251 0.8×	125	2.3k
Jessica Greene United States	31	3.0k 2.0×	1.1k 1.3×	924 1.7×	852 2.1×	699 2.1×	97	5.1k
John Furler Australia	31	1.7k 1.1×	866 1.0×	840 1.6×	677 1.7×	589 1.8×	144	3.7k
Marina Serper United States	33	650 0.4×	1.5k 1.7×	163 0.3×	239 0.6×	401 1.2×	151	3.9k
Neil Drummond Canada	27	940 0.6×	360 0.4×	167 0.3×	278 0.7×	400 1.2×	117	2.3k
LeRoi S. Hicks United States	26	1.1k 0.8×	366 0.4×	163 0.3×	482 1.2×	477 1.4×	49	2.4k
Elizabeth A. Bayliss United States	35	1.8k 1.2×	1.9k 2.2×	664 1.3×	1.2k 3.0×	642 1.9×	131	4.9k
Jennifer Elston Lafata United States	38	1.0k 0.7×	498 0.6×	770 1.5×	602 1.5×	555 1.7×	159	4.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Blakeman

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Blakeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Blakeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Blakeman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Blakeman

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Blakeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Blakeman. The network helps show where Thomas Blakeman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas Blakeman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas Blakeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas Blakeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas Blakeman. Thomas Blakeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Austin, Rosalynn, Thomas Blakeman, Muhammad Hossain, et al.. (2024). Diagnosing and managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a consensus survey. BMJ Open. 14(12). e092993–e092993.

Sperrin, Matthew, et al.. (2024). Defining, identifying and addressing problematic polypharmacy within multimorbidity in primary care: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 14(5). e081698–e081698. 2 indexed citations

Sperrin, Matthew, et al.. (2024). Protocol for the development and validation of a Polypharmacy Assessment Score. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(1). 10–10. 1 indexed citations

Morris, Charlotte, et al.. (2024). Inequalities in the Quality and Safety of Post‐Diagnostic Primary Care for People With Dementia: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 39(12). e70035–e70035.

Wright, Alison K., Matthew Carr, Christine Dickinson, et al.. (2023). Risk of Falls and Fractures in Individuals With Cataract, Age-Related Macular Degeneration, or Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmology. 142(2). 96–96. 13 indexed citations

Gibson, Helen, Caroline Sanders, Thomas Blakeman, et al.. (2023). Providing care to marginalised communities: a qualitative study of community pharmacy teams. British Journal of General Practice. 74(738). e49–e55. 5 indexed citations

Johnson, Rachel, Thomas Blakeman, Maria Panagioti, et al.. (2023). Treatment burden in multiple long-term conditions: a mixed-methods study protocol. BJGP Open. 7(4). BJGPO.2023.0097–BJGPO.2023.0097. 1 indexed citations

Blakeman, Thomas, et al.. (2022). Understanding the implementation of interventions to improve the management of frailty in primary care: a rapid realist review. BMJ Open. 12(6). e054780–e054780. 11 indexed citations

Forsyth, Faye, Thomas Blakeman, Jenni Burt, et al.. (2022). Cumulative complexity: a qualitative analysis of patients’ experiences of living with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 22(5). 529–536. 7 indexed citations

10.

Daker‐White, Gavin, Maria Panagioti, Sally Giles, et al.. (2021). Beyond the control of the care home: A meta‐ethnography of qualitative studies of Infection Prevention and Control in residential and nursing homes for older people. Health Expectations. 25(5). 2095–2106. 7 indexed citations

11.

Blakeman, Thomas, et al.. (2021). Identification and management of frail patients in English primary care: an analysis of the General Medical Services 2018/2019 contract dataset. BMJ Open. 11(8). e041091–e041091. 3 indexed citations

12.

Phipps, Denham L., Thomas Blakeman, Rebecca Morris, & Darren M. Ashcroft. (2019). Mapping the territory of renal care: a formative analysis of the cognitive work involved in managing acute kidney injury. Ergonomics. 62(9). 1117–1133. 4 indexed citations

13.

Daker‐White, Gavin, Rebecca Hays, Thomas Blakeman, et al.. (2018). Safety work and risk management as burdens of treatment in primary care: insights from a focused ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity. BMC Family Practice. 19(1). 155–155. 10 indexed citations

14.

Phipps, Denham L., Rebecca Morris, Thomas Blakeman, & Darren M. Ashcroft. (2017). What is involved in medicines management across care boundaries? A qualitative study of healthcare practitioners' experiences in the case of acute kidney injury. BMJ Open. 7(1). e011765–e011765. 28 indexed citations

15.

Martindale, Anne‐Marie, Rebecca Elvey, Susan J. Howard, et al.. (2017). Understanding the implementation of ‘sick day guidance’ to prevent acute kidney injury across a primary care setting in England: a qualitative evaluation. BMJ Open. 7(11). e017241–e017241. 23 indexed citations

16.

Evans, Julie, Gene Feder, Thomas Blakeman, et al.. (2016). Understanding tensions and identifying clinician agreement on improvements to early-stage chronic kidney disease monitoring in primary care: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 6(3). e010337–e010337. 15 indexed citations

17.

Fraser, Simon & Thomas Blakeman. (2016). Chronic kidney disease: identification and management in primary care. PubMed. Volume 7. 21–32. 111 indexed citations

18.

Reeve, Joanne, Thomas Blakeman, George Freeman, et al.. (2013). Generalist solutions to complex problems: generating practice-based evidence - the example of managing multi-morbidity. BMC Family Practice. 14(1). 112–112. 62 indexed citations

19.

Mahtani, Kamal R, Joanne Protheroe, Sarah P. Slight, et al.. (2013). Can the London 2012 Olympics ‘inspire a generation’ to do more physical or sporting activities? An overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 3(1). e002058–e002058. 95 indexed citations

20.

Blakeman, Thomas, et al.. (2011). . A qualitative study exploring the Quality and Outcomes Framework and self-management dialogue in primary care consultations. British Journal of General Practice. 61. 624–625. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact