Marlies Maes
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Health top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Janne VanhalstPamela QualterLuc GoossensWim Van Den NoortgateGerine M. A. LodderEeske van RoekelMaaike VerhagenMunirah Bangee
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (16 papers)Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Marlies Maes
44 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Social Psychology 1.1k
- Health 1.1k
- General Health Professions 524
- Sociology and Political Science 435
Countries citing papers authored by Marlies Maes
This map shows the geographic impact of Marlies Maes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlies Maes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlies Maes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marlies Maes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlies Maes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlies Maes. The network helps show where Marlies Maes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlies Maes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlies Maes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlies Maes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marlies Maes. Marlies Maes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up? The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scoresbreakdown → | 108 |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 59 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 137 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 66 | |
| 18 | 62 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 69 |
About Marlies Maes
Marlies Maes is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 46 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (16 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (14 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (1.1k citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (185 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations). Marlies Maes has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Janne Vanhalst, Pamela Qualter, Luc Goossens, Wim Van Den Noortgate, Gerine M. A. Lodder, Eeske van Roekel, Maaike Verhagen, Munirah Bangee, Rebecca Nowland and Susanne Buecker. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and Developmental Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.