Thomas A. C. Reydon
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Marc EreshefskyMarkus ScholzEsther M. van DijkWerner KunzKostas KampourakisLia HemerikGeorge P. PatrinosPeter Kroes
- Topics
- Philosophy and History of Science (36 papers)Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (11 papers)Evolution and Science Education (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Thomas A. C. Reydon
60 papers receiving 600 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- History and Philosophy of Science 271
- Sociology and Political Science 151
- Molecular Biology 101
- Genetics 93
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas A. C. Reydon
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas A. C. Reydon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas A. C. Reydon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas A. C. Reydon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas A. C. Reydon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas A. C. Reydon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas A. C. Reydon. The network helps show where Thomas A. C. Reydon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas A. C. Reydon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas A. C. Reydon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas A. C. Reydon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas A. C. Reydon. Thomas A. C. Reydon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 77 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Do the Life Sciences Need Natural Kinds | 5 |
| 15 | 18 | |
| 16 | Eva Jablonka and Marion J. Lamb , Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life . Reviewed by | 1 |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | Current Themes in Theoretical Biology : A Dutch Perspective | 18 |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Thomas A. C. Reydon
Thomas A. C. Reydon is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Ecological Modeling and General Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 671 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (36 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (11 papers) and Evolution and Science Education (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (271 citations), Ecological Modeling (45 citations) and Philosophy (72 citations). Thomas A. C. Reydon has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc Ereshefsky, Markus Scholz, Esther M. van Dijk, Werner Kunz, Kostas Kampourakis, Lia Hemerik, George P. Patrinos, Peter Kroes, Miles MacLeod and Pieter E. Vermaas. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, BioEssays and Organization Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.