Mark S. Turner

5.8k total citations
121 papers, 3.8k citations indexed

About

Mark S. Turner is a scholar working on Food Science, Molecular Biology and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark S. Turner has authored 121 papers receiving a total of 3.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 74 papers in Food Science, 53 papers in Molecular Biology and 23 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Mark S. Turner's work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (57 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (15 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (14 papers). Mark S. Turner is often cited by papers focused on Probiotics and Fermented Foods (57 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (15 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (14 papers). Mark S. Turner collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Malaysia. Mark S. Turner's co-authors include Philip M. Giffard, Gary A. Dykes, Bhesh Bhandari, Allan G.A. Coombes, Mutamed Ayyash, Brian C. Searle, Asma Sohail, Louise M. Hafner, Nidhi Bansal and Nimsha S. Weerakkody and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mark S. Turner

116 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark S. Turner Australia 36 2.0k 1.6k 866 540 369 121 3.8k
Neil P. J. Price United States 33 815 0.4× 2.0k 1.2× 564 0.7× 1.1k 2.0× 376 1.0× 137 3.9k
Gianluca Picariello Italy 39 1.8k 0.9× 2.3k 1.4× 1.1k 1.3× 821 1.5× 289 0.8× 184 4.9k
Bart C. Weimer United States 43 2.5k 1.3× 3.9k 2.5× 1.2k 1.4× 496 0.9× 444 1.2× 178 7.1k
Lanwei Zhang China 38 2.7k 1.4× 2.8k 1.7× 1.4k 1.6× 542 1.0× 500 1.4× 263 5.5k
Saïd Ennahar France 30 2.2k 1.1× 1.5k 0.9× 981 1.1× 262 0.5× 416 1.1× 62 3.3k
Atte von Wright Finland 38 2.5k 1.3× 2.3k 1.5× 1.2k 1.3× 509 0.9× 337 0.9× 106 5.0k
Nan Zheng China 48 1.3k 0.7× 2.6k 1.6× 935 1.1× 1.5k 2.7× 402 1.1× 298 6.9k
Yanick Auffray France 40 1.5k 0.8× 2.0k 1.2× 424 0.5× 213 0.4× 474 1.3× 123 4.1k
Fernanda Domingues Portugal 41 2.0k 1.0× 1.6k 1.0× 291 0.3× 1.0k 1.9× 467 1.3× 126 4.9k
Xiqing Yue China 34 1.6k 0.8× 1.5k 0.9× 1.1k 1.3× 281 0.5× 175 0.5× 148 3.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Turner. The network helps show where Mark S. Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark S. Turner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark S. Turner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark S. Turner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark S. Turner. Mark S. Turner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gumulya, Yosephine, et al.. (2025). Inactivation of KhpB (EloR/Jag) in Lactococcus cremoris increases uptake of the compatible solute glycine-betaine and enhances osmoresistance. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 91(10). e0091425–e0091425.
2.
Gumulya, Yosephine, Huadong Peng, Birgitta E. Ebert, et al.. (2025). Advancing Australia’s food future: Opportunities and challenges in precision fermentation. Future Foods. 11. 100630–100630. 2 indexed citations
3.
Dayananda, Buddhi, MirHojjat Seyedi, Mark S. Turner, et al.. (2025). Impact of Processing Parameters and Medium Properties on Escherichia Coli Inactivation in a Continuous Pulsed Electric Field System. IEEE Access. 13. 100247–100260.
5.
Yang, Shuyu, Yosephine Gumulya, Pilar Fernández‐Pacheco, et al.. (2024). Isolation of an exopolysaccharide-producing Weissella confusa strain from lettuce and exploring its application as a texture modifying adjunct culture in a soy milk alternative. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 428. 110992–110992. 5 indexed citations
6.
Wu, Yifei, et al.. (2023). Unravelling the aroma and flavour of algae for future food applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 138. 370–381. 32 indexed citations
7.
Turner, Mark S., et al.. (2023). Cyclic-di-AMP signalling in lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 47(3). 10 indexed citations
8.
Ayyash, Mutamed, et al.. (2023). Lactobacillus helveticus: Health effects, current applications, and future trends in dairy fermentation. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 136. 159–168. 47 indexed citations
9.
Shi, Wen, Manuel R. Plan, Pascal Courtin, et al.. (2021). Cyclic di-AMP Oversight of Counter-Ion Osmolyte Pools Impacts Intrinsic Cefuroxime Resistance in Lactococcus lactis. mBio. 12(2). 17 indexed citations
10.
Ayyash, Mutamed, Abdelmoneim Abdalla, Mohd Affan Baig, et al.. (2021). Invited review: Characterization of new probiotics from dairy and nondairy products—Insights into acid tolerance, bile metabolism and tolerance, and adhesion capability. Journal of Dairy Science. 104(8). 8363–8379. 109 indexed citations
11.
Turner, Mark S., Amin N. Olaimat, Tareq M. Osaili, et al.. (2021). An overview of microbial mitigation strategies for acrylamide: Lactic acid bacteria, yeast, and cell-free extracts. LWT. 143. 111159–111159. 31 indexed citations
12.
Mbye, Mustapha, Mohd Affan Baig, Synan F. AbuQamar, et al.. (2020). Updates on understanding of probiotic lactic acid bacteria responses to environmental stresses and highlights on proteomic analyses. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 19(3). 1110–1124. 109 indexed citations
14.
Zhu, Yan, Esteban Marcellin, Christopher B. Howard, et al.. (2018). Enhanced uptake of potassium or glycine betaine or export of cyclic-di-AMP restores osmoresistance in a high cyclic-di-AMP Lactococcus lactis mutant. PLoS Genetics. 14(8). e1007574–e1007574. 54 indexed citations
15.
Choi, Philip H., et al.. (2017). Structural and functional studies of pyruvate carboxylase regulation by cyclic di-AMP in lactic acid bacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 114(35). E7226–E7235. 45 indexed citations
16.
Ho, Van Thi Thuy, et al.. (2017). The genetic basis underlying variation in production of the flavour compound diacetyl by Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains in milk. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 265. 30–39. 40 indexed citations
18.
Ho, Van Thi Thuy, et al.. (2016). A genetic diversity study of antifungal Lactobacillus plantarum isolates. Food Control. 72. 83–89. 13 indexed citations
19.
Nguyen, Vu Tuan, Robert Barlow, Narelle Fegan, Mark S. Turner, & Gary A. Dykes. (2013). Role of Capsular Polysaccharides and Lipooligosaccharides in Campylobacter Surface Properties, Autoagglutination, and Attachment to Abiotic Surfaces. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. 10(6). 506–513. 5 indexed citations
20.
Searle, Brian C., et al.. (2011). Probabilistically Assigning Sites of Protein Modification with Scaffold PTM.. Journal of Biomolecular Techniques JBT. 22. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026