Mark Rose

2.4k citations
79 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Rose

67 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers

Mark Rose
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Literature and Literary Theory 194
  • Marketing 160
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 81
  • Urban Studies 65
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 48
Replace John Gallagher with:
John Gallagher United States
Joel A. Tarr United States
David E. Nye United States
John Langton United Kingdom
Gerald D. Nash United States
Deirdre Coleman United Kingdom
Geoffrey Blainey Australia
David Pinder United Kingdom
David Edgerton United Kingdom
Robert Fishman Netherlands
Mark Rose relative to John Gallagher United States John Gallagher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.5×
John Gallagher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Rose. The network helps show where Mark Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Rose Line = papers co-authored together Mark Rose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 20240
3 20230
4 202223
5 20191
6 20145
7 20081
8
Nine-Tenths of the Law: The English Copyright Debates and the Rhetoric of the Public Domain
200320
9
The Anti-Monopoly Origins of the Patent and Copyright Clause
20028
10 200211
11 19969
12 19931
13 19923
14 198423
15 19821
16 198111
17 19813
18 19795
19
Express highway politics, 1939-1956 /
19732
20 19722

About Mark Rose

Mark Rose is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, History and Philosophy of Science, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Health, having authored 79 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (18 papers), American History and Culture (6 papers), Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (4 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (3 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (3 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers) and Freedom of Expression and Defamation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (194 citations), Marketing (160 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (81 citations), Urban Studies (65 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (48 citations). Mark Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include R. A. Gayer, Janet Dehmer, Longyi Shao, Eric Avila, Christine Brooke‐Rose, Bruce E. Seely, Thomas J. Knight, Pauline Stanton, Richard F. Hirsh and Blaine A. Brownell. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Urban History, Technology and Culture, Enterprise & Society, Comparative Literature and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026