Neil W. Hamilton
About
In The Last Decade
Neil W. Hamilton
37 papers receiving 200 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
- General Health Professions 60
- Law 52
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 44
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 39
- Education 38
Countries citing papers authored by Neil W. Hamilton
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil W. Hamilton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil W. Hamilton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil W. Hamilton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil W. Hamilton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil W. Hamilton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil W. Hamilton. The network helps show where Neil W. Hamilton may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil W. Hamilton
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil W. Hamilton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil W. Hamilton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil W. Hamilton. Neil W. Hamilton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Gap Between the Foundational Competencies Clients and Legal Employers Need and the Learning Outcomes Law Schools Are Adopting | 1 |
| 2 | LEADERSHIP OF SELF: EACH STUDENT TAKING OWNERSHIP OVER CONTINUOUS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT/SELF-DIRECTED LEARNING | 1 |
| 3 | Professional-Identity/Professional-Formation/Professionalism Learning Outcomes: What Can We Learn About Assessment From Medical Education? | 1 |
| 4 | Off-The-Shelf Formative Assessments to Help Each Student Develop Toward a Professional Formation/Ethical Professional Identity Learning Outcome of an Internalized Commitment to the Student's Own Professional Development | 1 |
| 5 | Law Firm Competency Models and Student Professional Success: Building on a Foundation of Professional Formation/Professionalism | 1 |
| 6 | What Legal Education Can Learn from Medical Education About Competency-Based Learning Outcomes Including Those Related to Professional Formation (Professionalism) | 1 |
| 7 | Empirical Research on the Core Competencies Needed to Practice Law: What Do Clients, New Lawyers, and Legal Employers Tell Us? | 1 |
| 8 | The Qualities of the Professional Lawyer | 1 |
| 9 | What Legal Employers and Clients Want: The Competence-Model Approach to Legal Success | 2 |
| 10 | Encouraging Each Student's Personal Responsibility for Core Competencies Including Professionalism | 1 |
| 11 | Answering the Skeptics on Fostering Ethical Professional Formation (Professionalism) | 0 |
| 12 | Effectiveness Requires Listening: How to Assess and Improve Listening Skills | 2 |
| 13 | Ethical Professional (Trans)Formation: Early Career Lawyers Make Sense of Professionalism | 1 |
| 14 | Proactively Justifying the Academic Profession's Social Contract | 1 |
| 15 | Ethical Leadership in Professional Life | 0 |
| 16 | Assessing Professionalism: Measuring Progress in the Formation of an Ethical Professional Identity | 12 |
| 17 | Professionalism Clearly Defined | 5 |
| 18 | Fostering Professionalism Through Mentoring | 5 |
| 19 | Academic Tradition and the Principles of Professional Conduct. | 6 |
| 20 | Buttressing the Neglected Traditions of Academic Freedom | 3 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.