Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management788
Accounting708
Replace Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterly with:
Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterlyUnited States
Review of Social EconomyUnited States
DevelopmentUnited States
Vanderbilt law reviewUnited States
Journal of Cultural EconomyUnited Kingdom
Scandinavian Economic History ReviewSweden
Economic AffairsUnited Kingdom
South African Journal of Economic and Management SciencesSouth Africa
University of Toronto Law JournalCanada
Journal of Japanese StudiesUnited States
Cornell law review/The Cornell law quarterlyUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Enterprise & Society
Enterprise & Society · 1×
×1.22.0kEE
×1.21.7kSPS
×0.6706SM
×0.3231OBHRM
×1.2824ACCOU
Citations per year, relative to Enterprise & Society
Enterprise & Society · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Enterprise & Society
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Enterprise & Society. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Enterprise & Society with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Enterprise & Society more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Enterprise & Society
This network shows the impact of papers published in Enterprise & Society. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Enterprise & Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.