Technology and Culture

5.5k papers and 79.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.5k papers published in Technology and Culture in the last decades have received a total of 79.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Technology and Culture usually cover History and Philosophy of Science (671 papers), Sociology and Political Science (409 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (352 papers) specifically the topics of American Environmental and Regional History (318 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (226 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (219 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Technology and Culture are Wiebe E. Bijker, Bruno Latour, Norman M. Kaplan, N. W. Storer, Robert Κ. Merton, Carolyn Merchant, Langdon Winner, Jack Goodwin, Eugene Garfield and Richard R. John.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Technology and Culture

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Technology and Culture. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Technology and Culture.

Countries where authors publish in Technology and Culture

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Technology and Culture. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Technology and Culture with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Technology and Culture more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025