Mark Quirk

65 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Mark Quirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Family Practice 294
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 901
  • General Health Professions 765
  • Pharmacy 112
  • Speech and Hearing 145
Replace Steven R. Daugherty with:
Steven R. Daugherty United States
Jane Kidd United Kingdom
Timothy R. Dresselhaus United States
Michael Fordis United States
Konstadina Griva Singapore
Jonathan Silverman United Kingdom
Yvonne Birks United Kingdom
Mary Beth Happ United States
Janet Bull United States
Larrie Greenberg United States
Mark Quirk relative to Steven R. Daugherty United States Steven R. Daugherty's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Steven R. Daugherty · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Quirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Quirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Quirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Quirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Quirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Quirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Quirk. The network helps show where Mark Quirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Quirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Quirk Line = papers co-authored together Mark Quirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991226
2 1989179
3 1995107
4 199989
5 199185
6
Intuition and Metacognition in Medical Education: Keys to Developing Expertise
200680
7 200373
8 200872
9 198967
10 200564
11 201057
12 200556
13 200353
14 199351
15
Clinical teaching improvement: past and future for faculty development.
199748
16 201543
17 199243
18 199441
19 201040
20 200638

About Mark Quirk

Mark Quirk is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology, having authored 66 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (34 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (14 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (8 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (8 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (6 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (294 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (901 citations), General Health Professions (765 citations), Pharmacy (112 citations) and Speech and Hearing (145 citations). Mark Quirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sint Maarten and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Heather-Lyn Haley, Robert A. Ciottone, Kathleen M. Mazor, David Hatem, Warren J. Ferguson, Susan Starr, James R. Hébert, Rose S. Luippold, Judith K. Ockene and Jean L. Kristeller. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, Medical Teacher, Teaching and Learning in Medicine, Advances in Health Sciences Education and Preventive Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026