Mark Osteen

751 citations
50 papers · 327 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Osteen

37 papers receiving 249 citations

Peers

Mark Osteen
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Condensed Matter Physics 135
  • Literature and Literary Theory 54
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 140
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 16
  • Music 7
Replace Adam Chapman with:
Adam Chapman Israel
Michael MacDonald United States
Lars Løvlie Norway
Josephine Woll Germany
Sean M. Quinlan United States
Françoise Balibar France
Fengguang Liu China
Graham Smith United Kingdom
Janet C. Harris United States
Maria Ioannou Cyprus
Mark Osteen relative to Adam Chapman Israel Adam Chapman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Adam Chapman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Osteen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Osteen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Osteen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Osteen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Osteen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Osteen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Osteen. The network helps show where Mark Osteen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Osteen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Osteen Line = papers co-authored together Mark Osteen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199560
2 200549
3 199645
4 199616
5 201516
6 199915
7
White Noise: Text and Criticism
198513
8 20089
9 19978
10 20057
11 19967
12 19996
13
Echo Chamber: Undertaking the Body Artist
20055
14 20085
15 19964
16 20134
17 20134
18 19964
19
Seeking renewal: bloom, advertising, and the domestic economy
19913
20 20083

About Mark Osteen

Mark Osteen is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Condensed Matter Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Music, having authored 50 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (12 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (10 papers), GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (10 papers), Semiconductor materials and devices (6 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (4 papers), Music History and Culture (4 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (3 papers) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (135 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (54 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (140 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (16 citations) and Music (7 citations). Mark Osteen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Canada. Frequent co-authors include R. J. Hauenstein, T. C. McGill, D. A. Collins, R. S. Goldman, B. G. Briner, R. M. Feenstra, Don DeLillo, Zvonimir Bandić, F. Fedler and Martha Woodmansee. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Contemporary Literature, Journal of Electronic Materials, Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction and Modern fiction studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact