Graham Smith
- Materials Chemistry
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Inorganic Chemistry
- Co-authors
- Reinhard KapplGareth R. EatonSandra S. EatonNadeem KhanWolfgang LubitzEric J. L. McInnesGeorg GescheidtMichael D. Sevilla
- Topics
- Electron Spin Resonance Studies (4 papers)Visual Culture and Art Theory (4 papers)History of Science and Natural History (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBritish Journal of AnaesthesiaInternet Research
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Graham Smith
21 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Materials Chemistry 67
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 43
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 32
- Condensed Matter Physics 27
- Inorganic Chemistry 21
Countries citing papers authored by Graham Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Graham Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Graham Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham Smith. The network helps show where Graham Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham Smith. Graham Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 115 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | Sun pictures in Scotland | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Graham Smith
Graham Smith is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Biophysics and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 212 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electron Spin Resonance Studies (4 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (4 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (17 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (43 citations) and Condensed Matter Physics (27 citations). Graham Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Reinhard Kappl, Gareth R. Eaton, Sandra S. Eaton, Nadeem Khan, Wolfgang Lubitz, Eric J. L. McInnes, Georg Gescheidt, Michael D. Sevilla, Mark J. Burkitt and Motoji Ikeya. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.