Mark Hall

1.0k total citations
20 papers, 702 citations indexed

About

Mark Hall is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management Information Systems and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Hall has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 702 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 8 papers in Management Information Systems and 6 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Mark Hall's work include Construction Project Management and Performance (13 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (3 papers). Mark Hall is often cited by papers focused on Construction Project Management and Performance (13 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (3 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (3 papers). Mark Hall collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Mark Hall's co-authors include Elmar Kutsch, Cyril Tomkins, Andrew Graves, David Purchase, Robin Holt, David Denyer, John M. Ward, Tyson R. Browning and David Partington and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Project Management, European Journal of Information Systems and Construction Management and Economics.

In The Last Decade

Mark Hall

20 papers receiving 613 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Hall United Kingdom	14	440	248	179	163	144	20	702
Elmar Kutsch United Kingdom	15	424 1.0×	254 1.0×	81 0.5×	192 1.2×	116 0.8×	37	731
Roque Rabechini Brazil	10	420 1.0×	277 1.1×	183 1.0×	166 1.0×	58 0.4×	46	765
Henry C. H. Suen Hong Kong	13	815 1.9×	379 1.5×	369 2.1×	300 1.8×	150 1.0×	18	1.0k
Martin Morgan Tuuli United Kingdom	16	420 1.0×	268 1.1×	267 1.5×	97 0.6×	146 1.0×	42	822
Robert Joslin Norway	7	393 0.9×	217 0.9×	128 0.7×	153 0.9×	38 0.3×	15	576
A.K. Munns United Kingdom	6	568 1.3×	276 1.1×	295 1.6×	212 1.3×	58 0.4×	13	834
Bernard Kofi Baiden Ghana	14	598 1.4×	292 1.2×	434 2.4×	175 1.1×	77 0.5×	39	902
Nii Ankrah United Kingdom	16	512 1.2×	227 0.9×	245 1.4×	139 0.9×	309 2.1×	40	823
Faisal Manzoor Arain Singapore	16	588 1.3×	158 0.6×	450 2.5×	70 0.4×	197 1.4×	42	841
Samuel Laryea South Africa	15	487 1.1×	303 1.2×	264 1.5×	117 0.7×	99 0.7×	55	739

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hall

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hall's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hall with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hall more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hall

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hall. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hall. The network helps show where Mark Hall may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Hall

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Hall. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Hall based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Hall. Mark Hall is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kutsch, Elmar, et al.. (2021). How managers frame and make sense of unexpected events in project implementation. International Journal of Project Management. 39(5). 570–580. 14 indexed citations

Kutsch, Elmar & Mark Hall. (2020). Mindful Project Management: Resilient Performance Beyond the Risk Horizon. CERES (Cranfield University). 3 indexed citations

Kutsch, Elmar & Mark Hall. (2016). Project Resilience. 22 indexed citations

Kutsch, Elmar, Tyson R. Browning, & Mark Hall. (2015). Bridging the Risk Gap: The Failure of Risk Management in Information Systems Projects. Research-Technology Management. 57(2). 26–32. 14 indexed citations

Kutsch, Elmar, et al.. (2015). The Contribution of the Project Management Office: A Balanced Scorecard Perspective. Information Systems Management. 32(2). 105–118. 28 indexed citations

Kutsch, Elmar, et al.. (2012). Does risk matter? Disengagement from risk management practices in information systems projects. European Journal of Information Systems. 22(6). 637–649. 28 indexed citations

Hall, Mark, Elmar Kutsch, & David Partington. (2011). REMOVING THE CULTURAL AND MANAGERIAL BARRIERS IN PROJECT‐TO‐PROJECT LEARNING: A CASE FROM THE UK PUBLIC SECTOR. Public Administration. 90(3). 664–684. 5 indexed citations

Denyer, David, et al.. (2011). Exploring reliability in information systems programmes. International Journal of Project Management. 29(4). 442–454. 26 indexed citations

Kutsch, Elmar & Mark Hall. (2009). The Rational Choice of Not Applying Project Risk Management in Information Technology Projects. Project Management Journal. 40(3). 72–81. 41 indexed citations

10.

Kutsch, Elmar & Mark Hall. (2009). Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. International Journal of Project Management. 28(3). 245–255. 118 indexed citations

11.

Hall, Mark & Robin Holt. (2008). New Public Management and Cultural Change: The Case of UK Public Sector Project Sponsors as Leaders. Chapters. 3 indexed citations

12.

Hall, Mark & David Purchase. (2006). Building or bodging? Attitudes to sustainability in UK public sector housing construction development. Sustainable Development. 14(3). 205–218. 55 indexed citations

13.

Hall, Mark. (2005). Human Resource Management in The Knowledge Economy. 43 indexed citations

14.

Hall, Mark & Robin Holt. (2003). Developing A Culture Of Performance Learning In U.K. Public Sector Project Management. Public Performance & Management Review. 26(3). 263–275. 10 indexed citations

15.

Hall, Mark, Robin Holt, & David Purchase. (2003). Project sponsors under New Public Management: lessons from the frontline. International Journal of Project Management. 21(7). 495–502. 40 indexed citations

16.

Hall, Mark & Robin Holt. (2002). U.K. Public Sector Project Management—A Cultural Perspective. Public Performance & Management Review. 25(3). 298–312. 9 indexed citations

17.

Hall, Mark & Robin Holt. (2002). U.K. Public Sector Project Management: A Cultural Perspective. Public Performance & Management Review. 25(3). 298–298. 2 indexed citations

18.

Hall, Mark & Cyril Tomkins. (2001). A cost of quality analysis of a building project: towards a complete methodology for design and build. Construction Management and Economics. 19(7). 727–740. 45 indexed citations

19.

Graves, Andrew, et al.. (2000). Quality failure costs in civil engineering projects. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 17(4/5). 479–492. 173 indexed citations

20.

Hall, Mark, Robin Holt, & Andrew Graves. (2000). Private finance, public roads: configuring the supply chain in PFI highway construction. Explore Bristol Research. 6(3-4). 227–235. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact