Mark Griffiths

1.9k total citations
30 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Mark Griffiths is a scholar working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Human-Computer Interaction and Automotive Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Griffiths has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6 papers in Human-Computer Interaction and 3 papers in Automotive Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mark Griffiths's work include Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (6 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers). Mark Griffiths is often cited by papers focused on Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (6 papers), Augmented Reality Applications (5 papers) and Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers). Mark Griffiths collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and Italy. Mark Griffiths's co-authors include Philip B. Sugerman, M Carrozzo, Crispian Scully, Kobkan Thongprasom, Giovanni Lodi, Stephen Porter, Sevcihan Mutlu, Palle Holmstrup, D. Walter Wray and C Scully and has published in prestigious journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, Sensors and Clinical & Experimental Immunology.

In The Last Decade

Mark Griffiths

29 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Mark Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Periodontics 1.1k
  • Oral Surgery 466
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 277
  • Surgery 272
  • Dermatology 257
Replace Hung‐Pin Lin with:
Hung‐Pin Lin Taiwan
Pietro Messina Italy
Giuseppe Alessandro Scardina Italy
Patrícia Ramos Cury Brazil
Elismauro Francisco Mendonça Brazil
Mohammad S. Alrashdan Jordan
Mario Pagano Italy
Karthikeya Patil India
Matteo Trimarchi Italy
Vito Carlo Alberto Caponio Italy
Hung‐Pin Lin Taiwan View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Mark Griffiths
Mark Griffiths · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Mark Griffiths
Mark Griffiths · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Griffiths. The network helps show where Mark Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Griffiths

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Griffiths. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Griffiths based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Griffiths. Mark Griffiths is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 3
2 5
3 3
4 1
5 1
6 8
7 2
8 48
9 4
10 1
11 9
12
Social responsibility, player protection, and harm minimisation: how are online gambling operators doing?
2
13 50
14
IBL: No half-way house?
1
15 34
16 335
17 324
18 12
19 433
20
MANUAL OF ORCHIDS.
11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026