John Stoszkowski

785 total citations
25 papers, 578 citations indexed

About

John Stoszkowski is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, John Stoszkowski has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 578 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 13 papers in Education and 12 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in John Stoszkowski's work include Sport Psychology and Performance (11 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers) and Physical Education and Pedagogy (7 papers). John Stoszkowski is often cited by papers focused on Sport Psychology and Performance (11 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (10 papers) and Physical Education and Pedagogy (7 papers). John Stoszkowski collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. John Stoszkowski's co-authors include Dave Collins, Shane Pill, Áine MacNamara, Matthew J. Giblin, Loel Collins and Catherine Palmer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Sports Sciences and Quest.

In The Last Decade

John Stoszkowski

25 papers receiving 550 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Stoszkowski United Kingdom 13 370 242 209 152 111 25 578
Koon Teck Koh Singapore 14 196 0.5× 257 1.1× 182 0.9× 66 0.4× 52 0.5× 42 479
Michel Milistetd Brazil 14 326 0.9× 290 1.2× 361 1.7× 119 0.8× 150 1.4× 109 685
Alberto Férriz-Valero Spain 12 220 0.6× 176 0.7× 181 0.9× 200 1.3× 68 0.6× 74 581
Athanasia Chatzipanteli Greece 5 230 0.6× 177 0.7× 275 1.3× 121 0.8× 28 0.3× 15 510
Christine Nash United Kingdom 16 623 1.7× 496 2.0× 292 1.4× 75 0.5× 174 1.6× 41 862
Amândio Graça Portugal 14 192 0.5× 171 0.7× 308 1.5× 192 1.3× 134 1.2× 90 598
Ed Cope United Kingdom 15 363 1.0× 259 1.1× 213 1.0× 42 0.3× 114 1.0× 33 571
Mark Griffiths United Kingdom 13 161 0.4× 134 0.6× 125 0.6× 49 0.3× 30 0.3× 31 403
Larissa Rafaela Galatti Brazil 16 318 0.9× 256 1.1× 388 1.9× 143 0.9× 244 2.2× 144 865
Kelsey Kendellen Canada 14 191 0.5× 393 1.6× 246 1.2× 94 0.6× 52 0.5× 21 600

Countries citing papers authored by John Stoszkowski

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Stoszkowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Stoszkowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Stoszkowski more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Stoszkowski

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Stoszkowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Stoszkowski. The network helps show where John Stoszkowski may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Stoszkowski

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Stoszkowski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Stoszkowski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Stoszkowski. John Stoszkowski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stoszkowski, John & Dave Collins. (2021). A realist evaluation of the use of Flipgrid to facilitate collaborative online learning and reflection in sport coaching. Sport Education and Society. 27(8). 906–921. 8 indexed citations
2.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2021). Moving Toward Authentic, Learning-Oriented Assessment in Coach Education. International Sport Coaching Journal. 8(3). 400–404. 10 indexed citations
3.
Collins, Dave, et al.. (2021). How do high-level youth soccer players approach and solve game problems? The role of strategic understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 28(3). 229–243. 14 indexed citations
4.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2020). “Opinion and Fact, Perspective and Truth”: Seeking Truthfulness and Integrity in Coaching and Coach Education. International Sport Coaching Journal. 8(2). 263–269. 16 indexed citations
5.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2020). Using Flipgrid to improve reflection: a collaborative online approach to coach development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 26(2). 167–178. 21 indexed citations
6.
Collins, Dave, et al.. (2019). Coaching Games: Comparisons and Contrasts. International Sport Coaching Journal. 6(1). 126–131. 15 indexed citations
7.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2019). Students’ perceptions of the learner attributes required for (and resulting from) heutagogical learning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11 indexed citations
8.
Stoszkowski, John. (2018). Using Flipgrid to develop social learning. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 11(2). 32 indexed citations
9.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2018). What, when, how and why: Coaches' perceptions of coaching in junior rugby league. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 2 indexed citations
10.
Stoszkowski, John & Dave Collins. (2018). The Agony and the Ecstasy: Student-Coaches’ Perceptions of a Heutagogical Approach to Coach Development. International Sport Coaching Journal. 5(2). 136–144. 10 indexed citations
11.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2018). A heutagogical approach to coach education: what worked for one particular learner, how and why. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 12 indexed citations
12.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2018). “Who Wouldn't Want to Take Charge of their Learning?”. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice. 6(2). 104–107. 11 indexed citations
13.
Stoszkowski, John & Dave Collins. (2017). Nirvana or Never-Never Land: Does Heutagogy Have a Place in Coach Development?. International Sport Coaching Journal. 4(3). 353–358. 14 indexed citations
14.
Collins, Dave, et al.. (2017). Learning to Play Soccer: Lessons on Meta-cognition from Video Game Design. Quest. 70(3). 321–333. 14 indexed citations
15.
Stoszkowski, John & Dave Collins. (2015). Sources, topics and use of knowledge by coaches. Journal of Sports Sciences. 34(9). 794–802. 186 indexed citations
16.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2015). Using shared online blogs to structure and support informal coach learning. Part 2: the participants' view and implications for coach education. Sport Education and Society. 22(3). 407–425. 21 indexed citations
17.
Stoszkowski, John & Dave Collins. (2015). Using shared online blogs to structure and support informal coach learning—part 1: a tool to promote reflection and communities of practice. Sport Education and Society. 22(2). 247–270. 47 indexed citations
18.
Stoszkowski, John & Dave Collins. (2015). What makes them so good? The constructs used by coaches to identify coaching prowess. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 63–81. 3 indexed citations
19.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2015). Education’s not black and white, it’s vibrant grey. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 2 indexed citations
20.
Stoszkowski, John, et al.. (2011). Money, money, money? An investigation of the mediators of talent development in golf. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026