Maria M. Clapham
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Co-authors
- Mark D. FulfordKelly KingDonna AbecasisBruno GuerciRonnel B. KingAlejandro FrancoDanilo DonoloFermín Martínez‐Zaragoza
- Topics
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (10 papers)Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (3 papers)Design Education and Practice (2 papers)
- Journals
- Computers in Human BehaviorPersonality and Individual DifferencesAcademy of Management Perspectives
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Maria M. Clapham
15 papers receiving 404 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 328
- Cognitive Neuroscience 111
- Social Psychology 81
- Clinical Psychology 61
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 60
Countries citing papers authored by Maria M. Clapham
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria M. Clapham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria M. Clapham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria M. Clapham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maria M. Clapham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria M. Clapham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria M. Clapham. The network helps show where Maria M. Clapham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria M. Clapham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria M. Clapham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria M. Clapham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria M. Clapham. Maria M. Clapham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | Psychometric Characteristics of the CREA in an English Speaking Population | 22 |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 13 | |
| 5 | External validation of the Runco Ideational Behavior Scale | 1 |
| 6 | 101 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 59 | |
| 12 | Age Bias in Assessment Center Ratings | 14 |
| 13 | 84 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 25 |
About Maria M. Clapham
Maria M. Clapham is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 15 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (10 papers), Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function (3 papers) and Design Education and Practice (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (328 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (37 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (111 citations). Maria M. Clapham has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Mark D. Fulford, Kelly King, Donna Abecasis, Bruno Guerci, Ronnel B. King, Alejandro Franco, Danilo Donolo and Fermín Martínez‐Zaragoza. Their work appears in journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Personality and Individual Differences and Academy of Management Perspectives.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.