M. G. Lloyd

1.5k citations
99 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

M. G. Lloyd

95 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

M. G. Lloyd
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Urban Studies 228
  • Public Administration 53
  • Emergency Medicine 130
  • Finance 108
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 126
Replace Amber J. Fletcher with:
Amber J. Fletcher Canada
Douglas A. Wolf United States
Sally M. Miller United States
Mayer Hillman United Kingdom
James Rhodes United Kingdom
Deborah Phillips United States
Sarah Harper United Kingdom
Susan Hunter United States
Paul Tranter Australia
Richard Smith United States
M. G. Lloyd relative to Amber J. Fletcher Canada Amber J. Fletcher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.9×
Amber J. Fletcher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by M. G. Lloyd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. G. Lloyd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. G. Lloyd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. G. Lloyd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. G. Lloyd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. G. Lloyd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. G. Lloyd. The network helps show where M. G. Lloyd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside M. G. Lloyd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with M. G. Lloyd Line = papers co-authored together M. G. Lloyd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20241
3 202218
4 202210
5 20226
6 202115
7 202110
8 20211
9 202011
10 20192
11 201971
12 201423
13 20137
14 20122
15 20093
16 20075
17 2007144
18
Reflections on the 2001 United Kingdom Research Assessment Exercise for Town and Country Planning
20028
19 20010
20 19918

About M. G. Lloyd

M. G. Lloyd is a scholar working on Urban Studies, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Public Administration, Finance and History, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rural development and sustainability (17 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (12 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (12 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (11 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (10 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (7 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (7 papers) and Regional Development and Policy (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (228 citations), Public Administration (53 citations), Emergency Medicine (130 citations), Finance (108 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (126 citations). M. G. Lloyd has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Peel, Deborah Peel, Carol A. Fisher, Abhijit Pathak, John P. Gaughan, Kevin M. Bradley, John McCarthy, Thomas A. Santora, Amy J. Goldberg and Mark J. Seamon. Their work appears in journals such as Town Planning Review, International Planning Studies, Land Use Policy, Local Economy The Journal of the Local Economy Policy Unit and Epilepsy & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026