Town Planning Review

1.9k papers and 19.0k indexed citations

About

The 1.9k papers published in Town Planning Review in the last decades have received a total of 19.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Town Planning Review usually cover Urban Studies (512 papers), Sociology and Political Science (222 papers) and Finance (221 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Planning and Governance (250 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (216 papers) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (203 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Town Planning Review are Patsy Healey, Chris Webster, Andreas Faludi, Anastasia Loukaitou‐Sideris, Lawrence Wai‐Chung Lai, Richard E. Klosterman, Thomas B. Fischer, Klaus R. Kunzmann, Michael Hebbert and Richard Peiser.

In The Last Decade

Town Planning Review

1.2k papers receiving 13.5k citations

Countries where authors publish in Town Planning Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Town Planning Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Town Planning Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Town Planning Review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Town Planning Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Town Planning Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Town Planning Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026