Matt S. Treeby
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Raimondo BrunoSimon RiceCatherine E. PradoSimon F. CroweDavid KealyHelen M. AucoteG. Paul AmmingerBarry John Fallon
- Topics
- Emotions and Moral Behavior (7 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Matt S. Treeby
15 papers receiving 325 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Clinical Psychology 190
- Social Psychology 149
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 86
- Sociology and Political Science 46
- Cognitive Neuroscience 42
Countries citing papers authored by Matt S. Treeby
This map shows the geographic impact of Matt S. Treeby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matt S. Treeby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matt S. Treeby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matt S. Treeby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matt S. Treeby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matt S. Treeby. The network helps show where Matt S. Treeby may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matt S. Treeby
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matt S. Treeby. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matt S. Treeby based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matt S. Treeby. Matt S. Treeby is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | THE EMOTION REGULATION QUESTIONNAIRE: ERQ-9 FACTOR STRUCTURE AND MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE IN AUSTRALIAN AND CANADIAN COMMUNITY SAMPLES | 9 |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 78 |
About Matt S. Treeby
Matt S. Treeby is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotions and Moral Behavior (7 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (4 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (190 citations), Social Psychology (149 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (86 citations). Matt S. Treeby has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Raimondo Bruno, Simon Rice, Catherine E. Prado, Simon F. Crowe, David Kealy, Helen M. Aucote, G. Paul Amminger, Barry John Fallon, John S. Ogrodniczuk and John L. Oliffe. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Individual Differences, Frontiers in Psychology and Psychology and Aging.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.