International Planning Studies

635 papers and 10.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 635 papers published in International Planning Studies in the last decades have received a total of 10.4k indexed citations. Papers published in International Planning Studies usually cover Urban Studies (333 papers), Sociology and Political Science (149 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (143 papers) specifically the topics of Urban Planning and Governance (217 papers), Urban and Rural Development Challenges (103 papers) and Urbanization and City Planning (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Planning Studies are Nina Gribat, Kevin Morgan, J.S.C. Wiskerke, John Lovering, Thorsten Wiechmann, Roberta Sonnino, Klaus R. Kunzmann, Faranak Miraftab, Tim Marshall and Samer Bagaeen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International Planning Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Planning Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Planning Studies.

Countries where authors publish in International Planning Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Planning Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Planning Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Planning Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025