This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Hunter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Hunter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Hunter more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Hunter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Hunter. The network helps show where Susan Hunter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Hunter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Hunter.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Hunter based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Hunter. Susan Hunter is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hunter, Susan. (1994). Three-Dimensional Optical Memory Systems Based on 2-PHOTON Excitation: System Studies and Component Design.. PhDT.1 indexed citations
17.
Hunter, Susan, et al.. (1992). Rendering the "Text" of Composition.. 12(2). 395–406.1 indexed citations
Hunter, Susan. (1989). Oral Negotiations in a Textual Community: A Case for Pedagogy and Theory.. 8(3).3 indexed citations
20.
Hunter, Susan. (1984). An inquiry into policy conflict : the ontological basis of environmental policy disputes /. OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.