Deborah Peel

94 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Deborah Peel
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 334
  • Urban Studies 165
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 321
  • Building and Construction 177
  • Public Administration 33
Replace Jennifer Dixon with:
Jennifer Dixon United Kingdom
Ellen van Bueren Netherlands
Geert P.M.R. Dewulf Netherlands
Ian Cooper United Kingdom
Robert Gibson Canada
Stig Enemark Denmark
Daniella Tilbury Australia
John Stansbury United States
B. T. G. Chidzero
Pieter Leroy Netherlands
Deborah Peel relative to Jennifer Dixon United Kingdom Jennifer Dixon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.1×
Jennifer Dixon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Peel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Peel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Peel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Peel. The network helps show where Deborah Peel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Deborah Peel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Deborah Peel Line = papers co-authored together Deborah Peel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009130
2 2005111
3 201278
4 200070
5 200068
6 199968
7 200962
8 199652
9 199450
10 200446
11 200833
12 201133
13 201331
14 199030
15 199430
16 200628
17 200926
18 200324
19 200822
20 200519

About Deborah Peel

Deborah Peel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education, Urban Studies, Civil and Structural Engineering and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 95 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Urban Planning and Governance (15 papers), Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids (12 papers), Rural development and sustainability (10 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (8 papers), Coastal and Marine Management (7 papers), Irish and British Studies (6 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (334 citations), Urban Studies (165 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (321 citations), Building and Construction (177 citations) and Public Administration (33 citations). Deborah Peel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include William A. Bullough, Greg Lloyd, R. Stanway, Urmila Jha‐Thakur, Paola Gazzola, Sue Kidd, Thomas B. Fischer, M. G. Lloyd, Neil D. Sims and Andrew R. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Town Planning Review, Planning Theory & Practice, Planning Practice and Research, Innovations in Education and Teaching International and Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact