M. Enser

14.2k total citations · 4 hit papers
114 papers, 11.1k citations indexed

About

M. Enser is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Nutrition and Dietetics and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Enser has authored 114 papers receiving a total of 11.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 73 papers in Animal Science and Zoology, 36 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics and 29 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in M. Enser's work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (66 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (43 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (30 papers). M. Enser is often cited by papers focused on Meat and Animal Product Quality (66 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (43 papers) and Fatty Acid Research and Health (30 papers). M. Enser collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and United States. M. Enser's co-authors include J.D. Wood, R.I. Richardson, G.R. Nute, P.R. Sheard, A.V. Fisher, S.I. Hughes, FM Whittington, M.M. Campo, K.G. Hallett and Eleni Kasapidou and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Biochemical Journal.

In The Last Decade

M. Enser

111 papers receiving 10.3k citations

Hit Papers

Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: ... 1997 2026 2006 2016 2007 2003 2005 1997 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Enser United Kingdom 42 8.5k 2.7k 2.3k 1.5k 1.5k 114 11.1k
R.I. Richardson United Kingdom 40 8.3k 1.0× 1.8k 0.7× 2.0k 0.9× 1.5k 1.0× 1.7k 1.1× 142 10.4k
G.R. Nute United Kingdom 34 7.0k 0.8× 1.4k 0.5× 1.3k 0.6× 1.1k 0.7× 1.3k 0.9× 89 8.3k
R.J.B. Bessa Portugal 43 4.2k 0.5× 1.9k 0.7× 2.4k 1.1× 947 0.6× 988 0.7× 230 7.1k
M.M. Campo Spain 43 6.4k 0.8× 992 0.4× 1.2k 0.5× 909 0.6× 954 0.6× 133 7.6k
J.L. Aalhus Canada 39 4.2k 0.5× 1.3k 0.5× 1.0k 0.4× 917 0.6× 863 0.6× 216 5.9k
P.R. Sheard United Kingdom 18 4.5k 0.5× 1.1k 0.4× 798 0.3× 832 0.5× 757 0.5× 28 5.5k
F. K. McKeith United States 52 7.5k 0.9× 684 0.3× 689 0.3× 1.0k 0.7× 1.1k 0.7× 257 8.9k
A.V. Fisher United Kingdom 17 4.0k 0.5× 907 0.3× 960 0.4× 662 0.4× 941 0.6× 40 4.8k
D.L. Palmquist United States 43 2.4k 0.3× 2.9k 1.1× 6.3k 2.8× 664 0.4× 2.6k 1.7× 99 8.6k
M. Kirchgeßner Germany 34 2.4k 0.3× 2.9k 1.1× 1.2k 0.5× 722 0.5× 460 0.3× 793 7.4k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Enser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Enser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Enser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Enser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Enser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Enser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Enser. The network helps show where M. Enser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Enser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Enser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Enser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Enser. M. Enser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wood, J.D., M. Enser, A.V. Fisher, et al.. (2007). Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review. Meat Science. 78(4). 343–358. 2027 indexed citations breakdown →
2.
Wood, J.D., M. Enser, R.I. Richardson, & FM Whittington. (2007). Fatty Acids in Meat and Meat Products. 101–122. 27 indexed citations
3.
Sañudo, C., R. San Julián, Guðjón Þorkelsson, et al.. (2006). Regional variation in the hedonic evaluation of lamb meat from diverse production systems by consumers in six European countries. Meat Science. 75(4). 610–621. 100 indexed citations
4.
Demirel, Gülcan, et al.. (2004). Biohydrogenation of dietaryn-3 PUFA and stability of ingested vitamin E in the rumen, and their effects on microbial activity in sheep. British Journal Of Nutrition. 91(4). 539–550. 77 indexed citations
5.
Enser, M., et al.. (2004). Effect of age on the fatty acid classes of beef muscle. Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository). 1 indexed citations
6.
Enser, M., et al.. (2003). Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science, 2003. 3 indexed citations
7.
Wood, J.D., R.I. Richardson, G.R. Nute, et al.. (2003). Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: a review. Meat Science. 66(1). 21–32. 1874 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Scollan, N.D., S.K. Gulati, K.G. Hallett, J.D. Wood, & M. Enser. (2002). The effects of including ruminally protected lipid in the diet of Charolais steers on animal performance, carcass quality and the fatty acid composition of longissimus dorsi muscle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science. 2002. 9–9. 6 indexed citations
9.
Wachira, A.M., L.A. Sinclair, R.G. Wilkinson, et al.. (2002). Effects of dietary fat source and breed on the carcass composition,n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid and conjugated linoleic acid content of sheep meat and adipose tissue. British Journal Of Nutrition. 88(6). 697–709. 152 indexed citations
10.
Cameron, N. D., et al.. (1999). Meat quality of Large White pig genotypes selected for components of efficient lean growth rate. Animal Science. 68(1). 115–127. 45 indexed citations
12.
Enser, M., et al.. (1998). Organoleptic properties and fatty acid content of muscle from young lambs and hoggets fed grass diets. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science. 1998. 86–86. 1 indexed citations
13.
Enser, M., K.G. Hallett, B. Hewitt, G.A.J. Fursey, & J.D. Wood. (1996). Fatty acid content and composition of english beef, lamb and pork at retail. Meat Science. 42(4). 443–456. 464 indexed citations
14.
Wood, J.D., et al.. (1993). Further observations on the effects of molassed sugar-beet feed on the eating quality of pig meat. BSAP Occasional Publication. 17. 102–103. 3 indexed citations
15.
Enser, M. & J.D. Wood. (1993). Effect of time of year on fatty acid composition and melting point of UK lamb. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 10 indexed citations
16.
Longland, A. C., Justin N. Wood, M. Enser, et al.. (1991). PBA volume 1991 issue 1 Cover and Front matter. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production (1972). 1991. f1–f20. 1 indexed citations
17.
Sinnett‐Smith, Patrick A., John Woolliams, P. D. Warriss, & M. Enser. (1989). Effects of recombinant DNA-derived bovine somatotropin on growth, carcass characteristics and meat quality in lambs from three breeds. Animal Science. 49(2). 281–289. 14 indexed citations
18.
Enser, M., et al.. (1987). Effect of sodium 2-n-pentadecyl-benzimidazole-5-carboxylate (M & B 35347B), an inhibitor of acetyl-CoA carboxylase, on lipogenesis and fat deposition in obese hyperglycaemic (ob/ob) and lean mice.. PubMed. 11(6). 619–29. 3 indexed citations
19.
Wood, J.D., M. Enser, & D. J. Restall. (1975). Fat cell size in Pietrain and Large White pigs. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 84(2). 221–225. 16 indexed citations
20.
Enser, M.. (1964). Fatty acids and intestinal metabolism. Biochemical Journal. 93(2). 290–297. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026