Lyn Lim
-
- Online Learning and Analytics 15
- E-Learning and Knowledge Management 2
-
- Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods 17
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 3
- Health Informatics top 10%
- Education top 5%
- Online and Blended Learning 8
- Education and Critical Thinking Development 1
- Educational Assessment and Pedagogy 1
-
- Knowledge Management and Sharing 2
- Co-authors
- Inge MolenaarJoep van der GraafYizhou FanMaria BannertDragan GaševićJohanna D. MooreMladen RakovićShaveen Singh
- Journals
- Metacognition and Learning (4 papers)Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (3 papers)Frontiers in Psychology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyAustraliaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Lyn Lim
17 papers receiving 425 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Computer Science Applications 284
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 304
- Health Informatics 12
- Education 177
- Communication 27
Countries citing papers authored by Lyn Lim
This map shows the geographic impact of Lyn Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lyn Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lyn Lim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lyn Lim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lyn Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lyn Lim. The network helps show where Lyn Lim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Lyn Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 16 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 21 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 42 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 52 | |
| 13 | Effects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learningbreakdown → | 2022 | 104 |
| 14 | 2022 | 33 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 27 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 30 | |
| 18 | Facilitating self-regulated learning with personalized scaffolds on student's own regulation activities | 2020 | 1 |
About Lyn Lim
Lyn Lim is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Communication and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 18 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (17 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (15 papers), Online and Blended Learning (8 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), E-Learning and Knowledge Management (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (1 paper) and Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computer Science Applications (284 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (304 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Education (177 citations) and Communication (27 citations). Lyn Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Inge Molenaar, Joep van der Graaf, Yizhou Fan, Maria Bannert, Dragan Gašević, Johanna D. Moore, Mladen Raković, Shaveen Singh, Jonathan Kilgour and Tongguang Li. Their work appears in journals such as Metacognition and Learning, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Frontiers in Psychology, British Journal of Educational Technology and Educational Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.