Luke Woodham

1.0k total citations
25 papers, 627 citations indexed

About

Luke Woodham is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Luke Woodham has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 627 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 7 papers in Clinical Psychology and 6 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Luke Woodham's work include Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (7 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (6 papers). Luke Woodham is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (9 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (7 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (6 papers). Luke Woodham collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Poland. Luke Woodham's co-authors include Nabil Zary, Andrzej A. Kononowicz, Samuel Edelbring, Josip Car, Lorainne Tudor Car, Nakul Saxena, Natalia Stathakarou, David Davies, Jan Carlstedt‐Duke and Terry Poulton and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

In The Last Decade

Luke Woodham

25 papers receiving 602 citations

Peers

Luke Woodham
Luke Woodham
Citations per year, relative to Luke Woodham Luke Woodham (= 1×) peers Pirashanthie Vivekananda‐Schmidt

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Woodham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Woodham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Woodham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Woodham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Woodham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Woodham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Woodham. The network helps show where Luke Woodham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Luke Woodham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Luke Woodham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Luke Woodham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Luke Woodham. Luke Woodham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sin, Jacqueline, Claire Henderson, Victoria Cornelius, et al.. (2022). Effect of digital psychoeducation and peer support on the mental health of family carers supporting individuals with psychosis in England (COPe-support): a randomised clinical trial. The Lancet Digital Health. 4(5). e320–e329. 11 indexed citations
2.
Woodham, Luke, et al.. (2021). The Development of a Virtual World Problem-Based Learning Tutorial and Comparison With Interactive Text-Based Tutorials. Frontiers in Digital Health. 3. 611813–611813. 12 indexed citations
3.
Batchelor, Rachel, Claire Henderson, Steve Gillard, et al.. (2021). Perceived Acceptability and Experiences of a Digital Psychoeducation and Peer Support Intervention (COPe-support): Interview Study With Carers Supporting Individuals With Psychosis. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 24(2). e27781–e27781. 11 indexed citations
4.
Sin, Jacqueline, Claire Henderson, Steve Gillard, et al.. (2021). Mental health and caregiving experiences of family carers supporting people with psychosis. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. 30. e3–e3. 39 indexed citations
5.
Sin, Jacqueline, Claire Henderson, Victoria Cornelius, et al.. (2020). COPe-support - a multi-component digital intervention for family carers for people affected by psychosis: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 20(1). 129–129. 13 indexed citations
6.
Komenda, Martin, et al.. (2020). Medical curriculum standards: Towards relational database transformation. Health and Technology. 10(3). 759–766. 2 indexed citations
7.
Kononowicz, Andrzej A., Luke Woodham, Samuel Edelbring, et al.. (2019). Virtual Patient Simulations in Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(7). e14676–e14676. 284 indexed citations
8.
Sin, Jacqueline, et al.. (2019). A Multicomponent eHealth Intervention for Family Carers for People Affected by Psychosis: A Coproduced Design and Build Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 21(8). e14374–e14374. 37 indexed citations
9.
Woodham, Luke, Jonathan Round, Terese Stenfors, et al.. (2019). Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation. PLoS ONE. 14(4). e0215597–e0215597. 5 indexed citations
10.
Sin, Jacqueline, et al.. (2019). Usability evaluation of an eHealth intervention for family carers of individuals affected by psychosis: A mixed-method study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 1344225708–1344225708. 17 indexed citations
11.
Kononowicz, Andrzej A., Luke Woodham, Samuel Edelbring, et al.. (2018). Virtual patient simulations for health professional education. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 4 indexed citations
12.
Woodham, Luke, et al.. (2017). Standardization in medical education: review, collection and selection of standards to address. 5(1). 28–39. 2 indexed citations
13.
Woodham, Luke, et al.. (2017). Standardization in medical education: review, collection and selection of standards to address technical and educational aspects in outcome-based medical education. 5(1). 2 indexed citations
14.
Komenda, Martin, et al.. (2017). A Pilot Medical Curriculum Analysis and Visualization According to Medbiquitous Standards. 210. 144–149. 4 indexed citations
15.
Kononowicz, Andrzej A., Luke Woodham, Samuel Edelbring, et al.. (2016). Virtual patient simulations for health professional education. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 14 indexed citations
16.
Woodham, Luke, et al.. (2015). Medical Student and Tutor Perceptions of Video Versus Text in an Interactive Online Virtual Patient for Problem-Based Learning: A Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 17(6). e151–e151. 35 indexed citations
17.
Kononowicz, Andrzej A., et al.. (2011). Push and Pull Models to Manage Patient Consent and Licensing of Multimedia Resources in Digital Repositories for Case-Based Reasoning. Studies in health technology and informatics. 169. 203–7. 2 indexed citations
18.
Zary, Nabil, et al.. (2009). Enabling interoperability, accessibility and reusability of virtual patients across Europe - design and implementation.. PubMed. 150. 826–30. 11 indexed citations
19.
Conradi, Emily, David Burden, Luke Woodham, et al.. (2009). Virtual patients in a virtual world: Training paramedic students for practice. Medical Teacher. 31(8). 713–720. 82 indexed citations
20.
Kononowicz, Andrzej A., et al.. (2009). Development and Validation of Strategies to Test for Interoperability of Virtual Patients. Studies in health technology and informatics. 150. 185–9. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026