Luke Devine

16 papers receiving 816 citations

Hit Papers

Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82 2013 · 738 citations
7380+4+8Years since publication200400600

Peers

Luke Devine
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Family Practice 122
  • Physiology 634
  • Emergency Medical Services 156
  • Research and Theory 18
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 460
Replace Robert McGraw with:
Robert McGraw Canada
Yasuharu Okuda United States
Brendan Flanagan Australia
Joshua Quinones United States
Doreen Cleave‐Hogg Canada
Aaron W. Calhoun United States
Liana J. Kappus United States
Viva J. Siddall United States
Rami A. Ahmed United States
Lynne McCullough United States
Luke Devine relative to Robert McGraw Canada Robert McGraw's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Robert McGraw · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luke Devine

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luke Devine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luke Devine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luke Devine more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luke Devine

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luke Devine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luke Devine. The network helps show where Luke Devine may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Luke Devine, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luke Devine Line = papers co-authored together Luke Devine links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1
Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. AMEE Guide No. 82
Hit paper breakdown →
2013738
2 201127
3 201525
4 201521
5 201911
6 20216
7 20176
8 20176
9 20145
10 20143
11 20183
12 20152
13 20241
14 20171
15 20231
16 20171
17 20220

About Luke Devine

Luke Devine is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Family Practice, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Physiology and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 17 papers that have together received 857 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (8 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (3 papers), Radiology practices and education (3 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (2 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (122 citations), Physiology (634 citations), Emergency Medical Services (156 citations), Research and Theory (18 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (460 citations). Luke Devine has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include S. Barry Issenberg, Hyun Soo Chung, Ivette Motola, John E. Sullivan, Rodrigo B. Cavalcanti, Scott J. Millington, Irene Ma, Ryan Brydges, Jeroen Donkers and Matthew Morgan. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Teacher, Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, Academic Medicine, Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine and Canadian Medical Association Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact