Ludwika Goodson
- Education top 5%
- Innovative Teaching Methods 2
- Educational Assessment and Pedagogy 2
- Online and Blended Learning 2
-
- Educational Strategies and Epistemologies 1
- Behavioral and Psychological Studies 1
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Online Learning and Analytics 1
- Open Education and E-Learning 1
- Media Technology top 10%
-
- Web and Library Services 2
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Journal of STEM education (1 paper)Journal of Instructional Development (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Ludwika Goodson
8 papers receiving 272 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Education 241
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 86
- Computer Science Applications 32
- Library and Information Sciences 5
- Media Technology 28
Countries citing papers authored by Ludwika Goodson
This map shows the geographic impact of Ludwika Goodson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ludwika Goodson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ludwika Goodson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ludwika Goodson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ludwika Goodson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ludwika Goodson. The network helps show where Ludwika Goodson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Ludwika Goodson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SPARCT: A STEM Professional Academy to Reinvigorate the Culture of Teaching | 2018 | 6 |
| 2 | Online Teaching at Its Best: Merging Instructional Design with Teaching and Learning Research | 2017 | 28 |
| 3 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 4 | Faculty Development Centers and Libraries: United We Stand, Divided We Fall | 2015 | 2 |
| 5 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 6 | Matching teaching methods with learning outcomes | 2010 | 0 |
| 7 | Student Confidence Ratings and Learning Outcomes | 2007 | 1 |
| 8 | Higher Order Thinking Skills • Definition • Teaching Strategies • Assessment | 1998 | 95 |
| 9 | Roles for Success in Community Living: A Report on the Development of Self-Determination Training Materials. | 1995 | 1 |
| 10 | 1980 | 214 | |
| 11 | Models of Instructional Design: Origins, Purposes and Uses. | 1979 | 1 |
About Ludwika Goodson
Ludwika Goodson is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Computer Science Applications and Education, having authored 11 papers that have together received 359 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Teaching Methods (2 papers), Educational Assessment and Pedagogy (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (2 papers), Web and Library Services (2 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (1 paper), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (1 paper), Open Education and E-Learning (1 paper) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Education (241 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (86 citations) and Computer Science Applications (32 citations). Ludwika Goodson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Dee H. Andrews, Linda B. Nilson and Brian D. Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of STEM education and Journal of Instructional Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.