James M. Wood
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Howard N. GarbScott O. LilienfeldM. Teresa NezworskiSena GarvenRichard R. BootzinRichard L. GorsuchDouglas J. TatarynWilliam J. Stejskal
- Topics
- Psychological Testing and Assessment (31 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (19 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
James M. Wood
81 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Clinical Psychology 1.6k
- Applied Psychology 962
- Cognitive Neuroscience 891
- Social Psychology 698
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 662
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Wood
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Wood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Wood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Wood more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Wood
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Wood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Wood. The network helps show where James M. Wood may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Wood
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Wood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Wood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Wood. James M. Wood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 33 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | What's wrong with this picture? (critique of projective tests) | 1 |
| 11 | 40 | |
| 12 | The Rorschach Inkblot Test | 4 |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 100 | |
| 15 | 75 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 113 | |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 91 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About James M. Wood
James M. Wood is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, General Psychology and Anatomy, having authored 82 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychological Testing and Assessment (31 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (19 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (962 citations), Anatomy (227 citations) and General Psychology (101 citations). James M. Wood has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Howard N. Garb, Scott O. Lilienfeld, M. Teresa Nezworski, Sena Garven, Richard R. Bootzin, Richard L. Gorsuch, Douglas J. Tataryn, William J. Stejskal, Roy S. Malpass and April R. Bradley. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Psychological Science and Annual Review of Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.