Ray Bull

10.2k total citations
177 papers, 6.0k citations indexed

About

Ray Bull is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ray Bull has authored 177 papers receiving a total of 6.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 126 papers in Social Psychology, 76 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 52 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ray Bull's work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (123 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (70 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (45 papers). Ray Bull is often cited by papers focused on Deception detection and forensic psychology (123 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (70 papers) and Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (45 papers). Ray Bull collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Ray Bull's co-authors include Aldert Vrij, Rebecca Milne, Amina Memon, emma sleath, David Walsh, Samantha Mann, Lucy Akehurst, Günter Köhnken, Stavroula Soukara and Ronald P. Fisher and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Ray Bull

165 papers receiving 5.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ray Bull United Kingdom 43 4.0k 2.5k 2.2k 1.9k 706 177 6.0k
Saul M. Kassin United States 47 5.6k 1.4× 3.1k 1.3× 3.0k 1.4× 2.2k 1.1× 775 1.1× 162 7.8k
Pär Anders Granhag Sweden 43 5.6k 1.4× 3.0k 1.2× 3.2k 1.5× 2.4k 1.2× 1.1k 1.6× 207 6.5k
Ronald P. Fisher United States 47 5.1k 1.3× 4.4k 1.8× 2.2k 1.0× 1.6k 0.8× 1.2k 1.7× 139 7.2k
Christian A. Meissner United States 36 3.2k 0.8× 3.6k 1.4× 1.3k 0.6× 1.5k 0.8× 459 0.7× 113 5.8k
Steven Penrod United States 43 3.0k 0.8× 3.3k 1.3× 760 0.3× 1.6k 0.8× 302 0.4× 137 6.8k
Amina Memon United Kingdom 42 3.3k 0.8× 4.2k 1.7× 986 0.5× 873 0.5× 441 0.6× 140 5.6k
Bernard Rimé Belgium 40 3.2k 0.8× 891 0.4× 1.5k 0.7× 2.4k 1.2× 238 0.3× 133 6.6k
Neil Brewer Australia 38 2.4k 0.6× 3.2k 1.3× 747 0.3× 652 0.3× 374 0.5× 164 5.0k
Kerry Kawakami Canada 29 3.2k 0.8× 1.3k 0.5× 596 0.3× 4.8k 2.5× 103 0.1× 61 6.7k
Joshua Correll United States 29 1.8k 0.5× 1.8k 0.7× 617 0.3× 3.1k 1.6× 106 0.2× 63 5.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Ray Bull

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ray Bull's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ray Bull with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ray Bull more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ray Bull

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ray Bull. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ray Bull. The network helps show where Ray Bull may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ray Bull

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ray Bull. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ray Bull based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ray Bull. Ray Bull is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ng, Magdalene, et al.. (2024). “What you say in the lab, stays in the lab”: A reflexive thematic analysis of current challenges and future directions of digital forensic investigations in the UK. Forensic Science International Digital Investigation. 51. 301839–301839. 1 indexed citations
2.
3.
Bull, Ray. (2024). Is the interrogating/interviewing of crime perpetrators no longer suspect? A personal commentary on 25 years of progress. International Journal of Police Science & Management. 26(4). 414–420.
4.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2023). Improving the preparation of the investigative interviewing of suspects: A multidisciplinary perspective. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 57(4). 1235–1256. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2023). The non-stranger rapist-oriented interview for complainants: Eliciting high-quality accounts. The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles. 97(3). 435–457. 1 indexed citations
6.
Zhang, Hongwei, et al.. (2023). Understanding perceived legitimacy of correctional officers among male juvenile offenders in China: From a system perspective. International journal of law, crime and justice. 73. 100596–100596.
7.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2022). The Influence of Interview Style on SIOs’ Responsiveness to the Suspect’s Alibi. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. 38(2). 493–502. 2 indexed citations
8.
Milne, Rebecca, et al.. (2022). Fuelling an investigative mindset: the importance of pre-interview planning in police interviews with suspects. Psychology Crime and Law. 30(9). 1016–1040. 5 indexed citations
9.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2022). Experts’ views on improving the quality of non-stranger rape complainants’ accounts. The Police Journal Theory Practice and Principles. 96(4). 669–688. 1 indexed citations
10.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2021). Criteria‐Based Content Analysis in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: A Cross‐Cultural Perspective. Child Abuse Review. 30(6). 520–535. 5 indexed citations
11.
Cleary, Hayley M. D. & Ray Bull. (2021). Contextual factors predict self-reported confession decision-making: A field study of suspects’ actual police interrogation experiences.. Law and Human Behavior. 45(4). 310–323. 16 indexed citations
12.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2020). Investigative empathy: a strength scale of empathy based on European police perspectives. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 27(3). 412–427. 11 indexed citations
13.
Milne, Rebecca & Ray Bull. (2016). Investigative interviewing: investigation and probative value. 1 indexed citations
14.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2014). The Effect on Mock-Juror Decision-Making of Power-of-Speech Within Eyewitness Testimony and Types of Scientific Evidence. Psychiatry Psychology and Law. 22(3). 425–435. 4 indexed citations
16.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2011). Magistrates’ beliefs concerning verbal and non-verbal behaviours as indicators of deception.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5 indexed citations
17.
Bull, Ray, et al.. (2009). The effects of different presentation methods on multi-ethnicity face recognition. Psychology Crime and Law. 15(1). 73–89. 8 indexed citations
18.
Soukara, Stavroula, Ray Bull, Aldert Vrij, Mark Turner, & Julie Cherryman. (2009). What really happens in police interviews of suspects? Tactics and confessions. Psychology Crime and Law. 15(6). 493–506. 103 indexed citations
19.
Carson, David & Ray Bull. (2003). Handbook of psychology in legal contexts. Wiley eBooks. 29 indexed citations
20.
Poole, Debra Ann, D. Stephen Lindsay, Amina Memon, & Ray Bull. (1997). Did Pope (1996) read a different Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)?. American Psychologist. 52(9). 990–993. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026