Fiona Gabbert

3.4k citations
79 papers · 2.0k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Fiona Gabbert

72 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers

Fiona Gabbert
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Social Psychology 1.2k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 330
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 289
  • Gender Studies 106
Replace Jeffrey S. Neuschatz with:
Jeffrey S. Neuschatz United States
Lorraine Hope United Kingdom
J. Don Read Canada
Maria S. Zaragoza United States
Nathan Weber Australia
Solomon M. Fulero United States
Brian R. Clifford United Kingdom
D. A. Bekerian United Kingdom
R. C. L. Lindsay Canada
A. Daniel Yarmey Canada
Fiona Gabbert relative to Jeffrey S. Neuschatz United States Jeffrey S. Neuschatz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jeffrey S. Neuschatz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fiona Gabbert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Gabbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Gabbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Gabbert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fiona Gabbert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Gabbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Gabbert. The network helps show where Fiona Gabbert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Fiona Gabbert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Fiona Gabbert Line = papers co-authored together Fiona Gabbert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003270
2 2004167
3 2008139
4 2006113
5 2009100
6 200782
7 200674
8 202070
9 201268
10 201162
11 201345
12 202242
13 200841
14 201440
15 200335
16 201135
17 201235
18 201132
19 201731
20 201531

About Fiona Gabbert

Fiona Gabbert is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Clinical Psychology, having authored 79 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Deception detection and forensic psychology (49 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (48 papers), Radiology practices and education (10 papers), Face Recognition and Perception (9 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (8 papers), Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (7 papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (6 papers) and Psychological and Educational Research Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Social Psychology (1.2k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (330 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (289 citations) and Gender Studies (106 citations). Fiona Gabbert has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Amina Memon, Lorraine Hope, Kevin Allan, Daniel B. Wright, Ronald P. Fisher, Elin M. Skagerberg, Adrian J. Scott, Sarah Healey, James Ost and Rebecca M. Mullis. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Cognitive Psychology, Journal of Criminal Psychology, Law and Human Behavior, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition and Memory.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact