Amina Memon

8.4k total citations
140 papers, 5.6k citations indexed

About

Amina Memon is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amina Memon has authored 140 papers receiving a total of 5.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 110 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 85 papers in Social Psychology and 22 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Amina Memon's work include Memory Processes and Influences (96 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (82 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (23 papers). Amina Memon is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (96 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (82 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (23 papers). Amina Memon collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Amina Memon's co-authors include Fiona Gabbert, Ray Bull, Daniel B. Wright, Ray Bull, Kevin Allan, James C. Bartlett, Christian A. Meissner, Rebecca Milne, Gary L. Wells and Steven Penrod and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Bulletin, PLoS ONE and Journal of Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Amina Memon

136 papers receiving 5.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Amina Memon United Kingdom	42	4.2k	3.3k	986	873	814	140	5.6k
Neil Brewer Australia	38	3.2k 0.8×	2.4k 0.7×	747 0.8×	652 0.7×	550 0.7×	164	5.0k
Ronald P. Fisher United States	47	4.4k 1.0×	5.1k 1.5×	2.2k 2.2×	1.6k 1.9×	664 0.8×	139	7.2k
R. C. L. Lindsay Canada	35	2.9k 0.7×	2.5k 0.7×	477 0.5×	600 0.7×	272 0.3×	93	3.9k
Christian A. Meissner United States	36	3.6k 0.8×	3.2k 1.0×	1.3k 1.3×	1.5k 1.7×	236 0.3×	113	5.8k
Ray Bull United Kingdom	43	2.5k 0.6×	4.0k 1.2×	2.2k 2.2×	1.9k 2.2×	346 0.4×	177	6.0k
Roy S. Malpass United States	28	2.8k 0.7×	2.2k 0.7×	432 0.4×	1.1k 1.2×	228 0.3×	64	4.5k
R. Edward Geiselman United States	27	2.8k 0.7×	1.7k 0.5×	442 0.4×	409 0.5×	675 0.8×	89	3.9k
Saul M. Kassin United States	47	3.1k 0.7×	5.6k 1.7×	3.0k 3.0×	2.2k 2.5×	427 0.5×	162	7.8k
Siegfried L. Sporer Germany	31	2.2k 0.5×	2.6k 0.8×	1.1k 1.1×	1.1k 1.3×	153 0.2×	99	3.9k
Maria S. Zaragoza United States	29	2.6k 0.6×	1.8k 0.5×	249 0.3×	796 0.9×	654 0.8×	52	3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Amina Memon

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amina Memon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amina Memon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amina Memon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amina Memon

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amina Memon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amina Memon. The network helps show where Amina Memon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amina Memon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amina Memon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amina Memon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amina Memon. Amina Memon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Luke, Timothy J., Erik Mac Giolla, Amina Memon, et al.. (2023). What have we learned about cues to deception? A survey of expert opinions. Psychology Crime and Law. 31(5). 511–530. 4 indexed citations

Vredeveldt, Annelies, et al.. (2023). Culture, trauma, and memory in investigative interviews. Psychology Crime and Law. 32(1). 300–320. 13 indexed citations

Memon, Amina, et al.. (2022). Secondary traumatization in criminal justice professions: a literature review. Psychology Crime and Law. 29(4). 361–385. 5 indexed citations

Maras, Katie, et al.. (2017). Brief Report: Autism in the Courtroom: Experiences of Legal Professionals and the Autism Community. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 47(8). 2610–2620. 18 indexed citations

Crane, Laura, et al.. (2016). Experiences of Autism Spectrum Disorder and Policing in England and Wales: Surveying Police and the Autism Community. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. 46(6). 2028–2041. 85 indexed citations

Memon, Amina, et al.. (2013). Equipping witnesses with transferable skills: the Self-Administered Interview ^©. Psychology Crime and Law. 20(4). 315–325. 18 indexed citations

Holliday, Robyn E., Joyce E. Humphries, Rebecca Milne, et al.. (2011). Reducing misinformation effects in older adults with cognitive interview mnemonics.. Psychology and Aging. 27(4). 1191–1203. 37 indexed citations

Havard, Catriona & Amina Memon. (2009). The influence of face age on identification from a video line-up: A comparison between older and younger adults. Memory. 17(8). 847–859. 22 indexed citations

Wright, Daniel B., Fiona Gabbert, Amina Memon, & Kamala London. (2008). Changing the criterion for memory conformity in free recall and recognition. Memory. 16(2). 137–148. 41 indexed citations

10.

Colwell, Kevin, et al.. (2007). Vividness and spontaneity of statement detail charateristics as predictors of witness credibility. 25(1). 5. 20 indexed citations

11.

Colwell, Kevin, et al.. (2006). Strategies of impression management among deceivers and truth-tellers: How liars attempt to convince.. 24(2). 31. 39 indexed citations

12.

Valentine, Tim, Stephen Darling, & Amina Memon. (2006). How Can Psychological Science Enhance the Effectiveness of Identification Procedures? An International Comparison. Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University). 11(2). 21. 3 indexed citations

13.

Hope, Lorraine, Amina Memon, & Peter McGeorge. (2004). Understanding Pretrial Publicity: Predecisional Distortion of Evidence by Mock Jurors.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 10(2). 111–119. 58 indexed citations

14.

Memon, Amina & Fiona Gabbert. (2003). Unravelling the effects of a sequential lineup. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1 indexed citations

15.

Memon, Amina & Fiona Gabbert. (2003). Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: Do prelineup questions and sequential testing help?. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(2). 341–347. 35 indexed citations

16.

Memon, Amina, et al.. (2003). The Aging Eyewitness: Effects of Age on Face, Delay, and Source-Memory Ability. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 58(6). P338–P345. 52 indexed citations

17.

Memon, Amina, Lorraine Hope, & Ray Bull. (2003). Exposure duration: Effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence. British Journal of Psychology. 94(3). 339–354. 92 indexed citations

18.

Memon, Amina & Ray Bull. (2000). Handbook of the psychology of interviewing. J. Wiley eBooks. 146 indexed citations

19.

Poole, Debra Ann, D. Stephen Lindsay, Amina Memon, & Ray Bull. (1997). Did Pope (1996) read a different Poole, Lindsay, Memon, and Bull (1995)?. American Psychologist. 52(9). 990–993. 1 indexed citations

20.

Pennebaker, James W. & Amina Memon. (1996). Recovered memories in context: Thoughts and elaborations on Bowers and Farvolden (1996).. Psychological Bulletin. 119(3). 381–385. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact