Lois G. Schwoerer
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- History top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- J. G. A. PocockGordon J. SchochetWilliam B. GwynDerek HirstHoward NennerJonathan ScottConal CondrenJames Tully
- Topics
- American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers)Historical Economic and Social Studies (10 papers)Scottish History and National Identity (9 papers)
- Journals
- The American Historical ReviewThe Journal of Interdisciplinary HistoryThe Journal of Southern History
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Lois G. Schwoerer
36 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 229
- History 226
- Economics and Econometrics 121
- Sociology and Political Science 100
- Philosophy 55
Countries citing papers authored by Lois G. Schwoerer
This map shows the geographic impact of Lois G. Schwoerer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lois G. Schwoerer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lois G. Schwoerer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lois G. Schwoerer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lois G. Schwoerer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lois G. Schwoerer. The network helps show where Lois G. Schwoerer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lois G. Schwoerer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lois G. Schwoerer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lois G. Schwoerer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lois G. Schwoerer. Lois G. Schwoerer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gun Culture in Early Modern England | 3 |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | Politics and the political imagination in later Stuart Britain | 15 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 85 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | The Declaration of Rights, 1689 | 28 |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 17 | |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Lois G. Schwoerer
Lois G. Schwoerer is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 42 papers that have together received 447 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (13 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (10 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (226 citations), Political Science and International Relations (229 citations) and Religious studies (43 citations). Lois G. Schwoerer has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include J. G. A. Pocock, Gordon J. Schochet, William B. Gwyn, Derek Hirst, Howard Nenner, Jonathan Scott, Conal Condren, James Tully, Mark Goldie and Lawrence E. Klein. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and The Journal of Southern History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.