The Journal of Southern History

7.2k papers and 57.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.2k papers published in The Journal of Southern History in the last decades have received a total of 57.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Journal of Southern History usually cover Sociology and Political Science (2.1k papers), Political Science and International Relations (2.0k papers) and Marketing (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (1.8k papers), Race, History, and American Society (1.6k papers) and American History and Culture (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Journal of Southern History are Lewis Atherton, Roderick Nash, Darlene Clark Hine, Aldon Morris, James W. Loewen, William H. Harris, Michael Dawson, Kenneth O’Reilly, James R. Giese and Harvey H. Jackson.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Journal of Southern History

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Journal of Southern History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Journal of Southern History.

Countries where authors publish in The Journal of Southern History

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Journal of Southern History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Journal of Southern History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Journal of Southern History more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025