Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Strange Multiplicity
1995523 citationsJames TullyCambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of James Tully's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Tully with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Tully more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Tully. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Tully. The network helps show where James Tully may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Tully
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Tully.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Tully based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Tully. James Tully is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tully, James, Jeffrey L. Dunoff, Anthony F. Lang, Mattias Kumm, & Antje Wiener. (2016). Introducing global integral constitutionalism. Global Constitutionalism. 5(1). 1–15.12 indexed citations
Lang, Anthony F., Mattias Kumm, Antje Wiener, James Tully, & Miguel Poiares Maduro. (2013). Interdisciplinarity: Challenges and opportunities. Global Constitutionalism. 2(1). 1–5.5 indexed citations
Tully, James. (2008). Democracy and civic freedom. Cambridge University Press eBooks.6 indexed citations
10.
Tully, James. (2008). Imperialism and civic freedom. Cambridge University Press eBooks.7 indexed citations
11.
Andrew, Caroline, Linda Cardinal, Nicholas Brown, et al.. (2007). Managing Diversity : Practices of Citizenship. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).6 indexed citations
12.
Pagden, Anthony, J. G. A. Pocock, William Chester Jordan, et al.. (2002). The Idea of Europe. Cambridge University Press eBooks.105 indexed citations
13.
Gagnon, Alain‐G., Charles Taylor, James Tully, et al.. (2001). Multinational Democracies. Cambridge University Press eBooks.99 indexed citations
14.
Tully, James. (1998). A Fair and Just Relationship: The Vision of the Canadian Royal Commission on Aboriginal Peoples. Meanjin. 57(1). 146.1 indexed citations
Tully, James. (1992). Locke : droit naturel et propriété. Presses Universitaires de France eBooks.1 indexed citations
18.
Pufendorf, Samuel, James Tully, & Michael Silverthorne. (1991). On the duty of man and citizen according to natural law. Cambridge University Press eBooks.76 indexed citations
19.
Tully, James. (1990). Political Freedom. The Journal of Philosophy. 87(10). 517–523.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.