William B. Gwyn
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Law top 2%
- History top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- M. J. C. VileJ. G. A. PocockG. E. AylmerCaroline RobbinsLois G. SchwoererGeorge C. EdwardsRobert D. Putnam
- Topics
- Ombudsman and Human Rights (3 papers)International Law and Human Rights (2 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
William B. Gwyn
17 papers receiving 186 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 188
- Sociology and Political Science 104
- Law 63
- History 53
- Economics and Econometrics 49
Countries citing papers authored by William B. Gwyn
This map shows the geographic impact of William B. Gwyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William B. Gwyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William B. Gwyn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by William B. Gwyn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by William B. Gwyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William B. Gwyn. The network helps show where William B. Gwyn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of William B. Gwyn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of William B. Gwyn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of William B. Gwyn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with William B. Gwyn. William B. Gwyn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cruel Nero: the concept of the tyrant and the image of Nero in western political thought | 4 |
| 2 | The Indeterminacy of the Separation of Powers in the Age of the Framers | 0 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Democracy and the Cost of Politics in Britain | 4 |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | Bureaucrats and Politicians: Contending Elites in the Policy Process | 3 |
| 12 | 32 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 97 | |
| 18 | The meaning of the separation of powers: an analysis of the doctrine from its origin to the adoption of the United States constitution | 11 |
| 19 | 9 |
About William B. Gwyn
William B. Gwyn is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ombudsman and Human Rights (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (2 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (188 citations), Law (63 citations) and History (53 citations). William B. Gwyn has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include M. J. C. Vile, J. G. A. Pocock, G. E. Aylmer, Caroline Robbins, Lois G. Schwoerer, George C. Edwards and Robert D. Putnam. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, The Journal of Politics and Public Administration.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.