Michael Mendle
- History top 0.5%
- Scottish History and National Identity 4
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 3
- Historical Studies of British Isles 2
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 1
-
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 6
- Historical Influence and Diplomacy 1
- Philosophy top 5%
- Classics top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
-
- Irish and British Studies 1
- Australian History and Society 1
- Co-authors
- Markku PeltonenClayton RobertsWill CosterIan GentlesJ. G. A. PocockJonathan ScottJohn RobertsonConal Condren
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)The Historical Journal (2 papers)The Journal of Modern History (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael Mendle
14 papers receiving 181 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
- History 160
- Political Science and International Relations 153
- Philosophy 58
- Classics 17
- Anthropology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Mendle
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Mendle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Mendle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Mendle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Mendle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Mendle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Mendle. The network helps show where Michael Mendle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Michael Mendle, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain | 2005 | 81 |
| 2 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2003 | 9 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1997 | 47 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1995 | 14 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 10 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 85 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1989 | 5 | |
| 15 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1986 | 20 |
About Michael Mendle
Michael Mendle is a scholar working on History, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 309 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (6 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (4 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers), Historical Studies of British Isles (2 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (1 paper), Irish and British Studies (1 paper), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (1 paper) and Australian History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (160 citations), Political Science and International Relations (153 citations), Philosophy (58 citations), Classics (17 citations) and Anthropology (42 citations). Michael Mendle has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Markku Peltonen, Clayton Roberts, Will Coster, Ian Gentles, J. G. A. Pocock, Jonathan Scott, John Robertson, Conal Condren, James Tully and Mark Goldie. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Historical Journal, The Journal of Modern History, American Journal of Legal History and The Journal of Military History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.