Lisa Roberts
- Pharmacology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul LittleCatherine PopeMaxi MiciakRose WilesNathan HuttingJ.P. CañeiroAnn AshburnSophia Hulbert
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (28 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers)Clinical practice guidelines implementation (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSpineSocial Science & Medicine
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lisa Roberts
68 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Pharmacology 517
- General Health Professions 316
- Psychiatry and Mental health 242
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 240
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 219
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Roberts. The network helps show where Lisa Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Roberts. Lisa Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 35 | |
| 8 | 25 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 20 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | Returning to work: issues for nurses and managers following an episode of low back pain | 4 |
| 20 | 52 |
About Lisa Roberts
Lisa Roberts is a scholar working on Family Practice, Pharmacology and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (28 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (11 papers) and Clinical practice guidelines implementation (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (517 citations), Medical Laboratory Technology (36 citations) and Family Practice (50 citations). Lisa Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul Little, Catherine Pope, Maxi Miciak, Rose Wiles, Nathan Hutting, J.P. Cañeiro, Ann Ashburn, Sophia Hulbert, Sara Demain and Kathryn McPherson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Spine and Social Science & Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.