Rose Wiles

5.2k citations
83 papers · 3.4k indexed · h-index 35

Rose Wiles

79 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Peers

Rose Wiles
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Rehabilitation 622
  • General Health Professions 1.0k
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 150
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 522
  • Occupational Therapy 134
Replace Mélanie Levasseur with:
Mélanie Levasseur Canada
Nancy Morrow‐Howell United States
Hal Kendig Australia
Richard M. Shewchuk United States
Shane Thomas Australia
Linda Lindsey Davis United States
Pia Kontos Canada
Pat Schofield United Kingdom
J M Linacre United States
Vicki A. Freedman United States
Rose Wiles relative to Mélanie Levasseur Canada Mélanie Levasseur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Mélanie Levasseur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Rose Wiles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rose Wiles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rose Wiles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rose Wiles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rose Wiles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rose Wiles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rose Wiles. The network helps show where Rose Wiles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Rose Wiles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Rose Wiles Line = papers co-authored together Rose Wiles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201721
2 20173
3 201021
4 2008172
5 200852
6 200896
7 200899
8 200482
9 200465
10 20021
11 200229
12
Psychosocial, lifestyle, and health status variables in predicting high attendance among adults.
200152
13 200175
14 199960
15 199926
16 199895
17 199834
18 199737
19 199467
20
Study of patients who chose private health care for treatment.
199213

About Rose Wiles

Rose Wiles is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Pharmacy, Occupational Therapy, Psychiatry and Mental health and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 83 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (14 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (10 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (9 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (8 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (7 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (5 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (622 citations), General Health Professions (1.0k citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (150 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (522 citations) and Occupational Therapy (134 citations). Rose Wiles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, New Zealand and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Graham Crow, Sue Heath, Vikki Charles, Ann Ashburn, Judy Robison, Sheila Payne, Cheryl Cott, Melanie Nind, Helen Pain and Caroline Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Physiotherapy, International Journal of Social Research Methodology and Qualitative Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026