David Turner

9.5k total citations
244 papers, 5.6k citations indexed

About

David Turner is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, David Turner has authored 244 papers receiving a total of 5.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 48 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 46 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in David Turner's work include Innovations in Medical Education (32 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (30 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (28 papers). David Turner is often cited by papers focused on Innovations in Medical Education (32 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (30 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (28 papers). David Turner collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. David Turner's co-authors include Ira M. Cheifetz, Kyle J. Rehder, Keith R. Abrams, Nicola J. Cooper, Alex J. Sutton, Jan Hau Lee, Allan Wailoo, David Zaas, Paul Little and Karl G. Nicholson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PEDIATRICS.

In The Last Decade

David Turner

227 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
David Turner United States 40 1.2k 1.1k 1.1k 737 716 244 5.6k
Nicholas Black United Kingdom 18 684 0.5× 968 0.9× 1.6k 1.5× 1.2k 1.6× 355 0.5× 39 8.9k
Ron Keren United States 49 1.3k 1.1× 2.4k 2.3× 1.2k 1.2× 634 0.9× 908 1.3× 116 6.6k
Roman Jaeschke Canada 28 1.1k 0.9× 1.3k 1.3× 1.7k 1.6× 968 1.3× 437 0.6× 47 7.4k
Reed Siemieniuk Canada 42 1.2k 1.0× 2.2k 2.1× 1.1k 1.0× 574 0.8× 329 0.5× 98 6.1k
Helen Doll United Kingdom 49 1.2k 1.0× 1.1k 1.1× 2.2k 2.1× 1.3k 1.7× 357 0.5× 153 9.4k
Scarlett L. Bellamy United States 43 939 0.8× 1.7k 1.7× 1.1k 1.0× 557 0.8× 638 0.9× 147 5.8k
Marjolein Y. Berger Netherlands 37 573 0.5× 980 0.9× 1.9k 1.8× 641 0.9× 261 0.4× 210 5.7k
Mark Helfand United States 35 518 0.4× 926 0.9× 1.4k 1.3× 841 1.1× 396 0.6× 86 6.2k
Joel Singer Canada 40 1.3k 1.0× 2.1k 2.0× 2.4k 2.3× 989 1.3× 293 0.4× 141 12.0k
Ian Shrier Canada 48 623 0.5× 1.2k 1.1× 3.3k 3.1× 1.4k 1.8× 305 0.4× 291 10.6k

Countries citing papers authored by David Turner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Turner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Turner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Turner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Turner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Turner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Turner. The network helps show where David Turner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Turner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Turner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Turner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Turner. David Turner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Geraghty, Adam W A, Taeko Becque, Lisa Roberts, et al.. (2025). Supporting self-management with an internet intervention for low back pain in primary care: a RCT (SupportBack 2). Health Technology Assessment. 29(7). 1–90.
2.
Moffatt, Mary E., et al.. (2024). Competency based medical education – Where do I start?. Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care. 54(10). 101674–101674. 1 indexed citations
3.
Martin‐Kerry, Jacqueline, Sion Scott, Jo Taylor, et al.. (2024). Supporting meaningful participation of older people in core outcome set development. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 73(2). 661–665.
4.
Mink, Richard, Alan Schwartz, John D. Mahan, et al.. (2024). Level of Supervision for the Entrustable Professional Activities Common to General Pediatrics and the Subspecialties Decreases from Residency to Fellowship. Academic Pediatrics. 24(7). 1025–1030. 1 indexed citations
5.
Caretta‐Weyer, Holly, Michael Barone, Jason R. Frank, et al.. (2024). The Next Era of Assessment: Building a Trustworthy Assessment System. Perspectives on Medical Education. 13(1). 12–23. 6 indexed citations
6.
Schumacher, Daniel J., et al.. (2024). A realist evaluation of prospective entrustment decisions in paediatric residency clinical competency committees. Medical Education. 59(3). 292–301. 1 indexed citations
7.
Busari, Jamiu O., Karen E. Hauer, Kimberly D. Lomis, et al.. (2024). Advancing anti-oppression and social justice in healthcare through competency-based medical education (CBME). Medical Teacher. 46(9). 1167–1174. 7 indexed citations
9.
Schumacher, Daniel J., et al.. (2023). A realist synthesis of prospective entrustment decision making by entrustment or clinical competency committees. Medical Education. 58(7). 812–824. 7 indexed citations
10.
Schumacher, Daniel J., et al.. (2022). Making prospective entrustment decisions: Knowing limits, seeking help and defaulting. Medical Education. 56(9). 892–900. 16 indexed citations
11.
Mink, Richard, David Turner, Donald L. Boyer, et al.. (2022). Best Practices in Medical Documentation: A Curricular Module. Academic Pediatrics. 22(8). 1271–1277. 1 indexed citations
12.
Chen, Lucia, et al.. (2020). Reducing delays to administration of prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with vitamin K antagonist-related intracerebral haemorrhage. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 81(2). 1–6. 1 indexed citations
13.
14.
Turner, David, et al.. (2018). Leadership in a time of exponential change. 40(3). 52.
15.
Little, Paul, Sheila Turner, Kate Rumsby, et al.. (2009). Dipsticks and diagnostic algorithms in urinary tract infection: development and validation, randomised trial, economic analysis, observational cohort and qualitative study. Health Technology Assessment. 13(19). iii–iv, ix. 92 indexed citations
16.
Frampton, Geoff K, et al.. (2008). Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Technology Assessment. 12. 4 indexed citations
17.
Turner, David, Sanjoy K. Paul, Margaret Stone, et al.. (2007). The Cost-Effectiveness of a Disease Management Programme for Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease and Heart Failure in Primary Care. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
18.
Williams, K, Keith R. Abrams, David Turner, et al.. (2006). Systematic review and evaluation of methods of assessing urinary incontinence. Health Technology Assessment. 10(6). 1–132, iii. 128 indexed citations
19.
Turner, David. (2004). The costs of stress urinary incontinence.. PubMed. 114(5923). suppl 11–4 following 54. 3 indexed citations
20.
Turner, David, Allan Wailoo, Karl G. Nicholson, et al.. (2003). Systematic review and economic decision modelling for the prevention and treatment of influenza A and B. Health Technology Assessment. 7(35). iii–iv, xi. 188 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026