Susan Eardley

786 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 603 citations indexed

About

Susan Eardley is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Susan Eardley has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 603 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Complementary and alternative medicine, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Susan Eardley's work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers). Susan Eardley is often cited by papers focused on Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers) and Pain Management and Placebo Effect (2 papers). Susan Eardley collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and United States. Susan Eardley's co-authors include George Lewith, Philip Prescott, Lily Lai, Geraldine Leydon, Sam Watts, Brian Birch, Francesco Cardini, Vinjar Fønnebø, Felicity L. Bishop and Gabriella Hegyi and has published in prestigious journals such as BMJ Open, Complementary Medicine Research and European Journal of Integrative Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Susan Eardley

7 papers receiving 587 citations

Hit Papers

Depression and anxiety in prostate cancer: a systematic r... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Susan Eardley United Kingdom 6 265 190 112 97 96 7 603
Lily Lai United Kingdom 9 268 1.0× 127 0.7× 127 1.1× 104 1.1× 85 0.9× 26 645
Chiewkwei Kaw United States 8 417 1.6× 203 1.1× 119 1.1× 123 1.3× 235 2.4× 9 720
Krupali Desai United States 14 350 1.3× 330 1.7× 112 1.0× 41 0.4× 135 1.4× 18 763
Matthias Kröz Germany 14 256 1.0× 116 0.6× 122 1.1× 32 0.3× 162 1.7× 48 556
Bianca Senf Germany 15 252 1.0× 364 1.9× 67 0.6× 65 0.7× 151 1.6× 29 763
Liz Roffe United Kingdom 6 280 1.1× 71 0.4× 89 0.8× 88 0.9× 134 1.4× 8 551
Jennifer Finnegan-John United Kingdom 9 264 1.0× 266 1.4× 89 0.8× 30 0.3× 90 0.9× 18 626
Anna Cargill United Kingdom 7 287 1.1× 97 0.5× 80 0.7× 51 0.5× 133 1.4× 8 682
Ichiro Mikami Japan 10 575 2.2× 77 0.4× 201 1.8× 189 1.9× 287 3.0× 12 846
Christina Seluzicki United States 15 462 1.7× 232 1.2× 126 1.1× 17 0.2× 73 0.8× 27 802

Countries citing papers authored by Susan Eardley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Susan Eardley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Susan Eardley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Susan Eardley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Susan Eardley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Susan Eardley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Susan Eardley. The network helps show where Susan Eardley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Susan Eardley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Susan Eardley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Susan Eardley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Susan Eardley. Susan Eardley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Bradbury, Katherine, Dawn Carnes, Borislav D. Dimitrov, et al.. (2016). Non-specific mechanisms in orthodox and CAM management of low back pain (MOCAM): theoretical framework and protocol for a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 6(5). e012209–e012209. 7 indexed citations
2.
Watts, Sam, Geraldine Leydon, Brian Birch, et al.. (2014). Depression and anxiety in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence rates. BMJ Open. 4(3). e003901–e003901. 375 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Eardley, Susan, Sarah Brien, Paul Little, Philip Prescott, & George Lewith. (2013). Professional Kinesiology Practice for Chronic Low Back Pain: Single-Blind, Randomised Controlled Pilot Study. Complementary Medicine Research. 20(3). 180–188. 8 indexed citations
4.
Eardley, Susan, Felicity L. Bishop, Philip Prescott, et al.. (2013). CAM use in Europe – The patients’ perspective. Part I: A systematic literature review of CAM prevalence in the EU. Phaidra (Universität Wien). 8 indexed citations
5.
Eardley, Susan, Felicity L. Bishop, Philip Prescott, et al.. (2012). A Systematic Literature Review of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Prevalence in EU. Complementary Medicine Research. 19(Suppl. 2). 18–28. 178 indexed citations
6.
Eardley, Susan, Felicity L. Bishop, Francesco Cardini, et al.. (2012). A Pilot Feasibility Study of a Questionnaire to Determine European Union-Wide CAM Use. Complementary Medicine Research. 19(6). 302–310. 25 indexed citations
7.
Eardley, Susan. (2010). A pragmatic randomised controlled pilot study of Professional Kinesiology Practice for chronic and recurrent low back pain with initial feasibility study. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 2(4). 189–189. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026