Annette Bishop

3.0k total citations
74 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Annette Bishop is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Annette Bishop has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 55 papers in Pharmacology, 27 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 19 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Annette Bishop's work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (55 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (15 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (14 papers). Annette Bishop is often cited by papers focused on Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (55 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (15 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (14 papers). Annette Bishop collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Qatar. Annette Bishop's co-authors include Nadine E. Foster, Elaine Thomas, Chris J. Main, Elaine M. Hay, Kate M. Dunn, Chris Littlewood, Stephen May, Tom Sanders, Melanie Holden and Bie Nio Ong and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Pain.

In The Last Decade

Annette Bishop

72 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annette Bishop United Kingdom 21 1.5k 556 399 398 370 74 2.1k
Samantha Bunzli Australia 27 1.4k 1.0× 504 0.9× 315 0.8× 485 1.2× 234 0.6× 81 2.5k
Janet K. Freburger United States 21 1.3k 0.9× 495 0.9× 280 0.7× 418 1.1× 248 0.7× 45 2.4k
Rosmin Esmail Canada 17 1.4k 0.9× 349 0.6× 291 0.7× 371 0.9× 199 0.5× 36 2.1k
Ricky Mullis United Kingdom 20 1.4k 0.9× 447 0.8× 281 0.7× 800 2.0× 451 1.2× 48 2.3k
Paul Campbell United Kingdom 26 1.0k 0.7× 351 0.6× 212 0.5× 504 1.3× 154 0.4× 80 2.1k
Ross Wilkie United Kingdom 31 1.2k 0.8× 541 1.0× 196 0.5× 697 1.8× 189 0.5× 75 2.7k
Jason M. Beneciuk United States 28 2.2k 1.5× 254 0.5× 214 0.5× 533 1.3× 363 1.0× 76 2.7k
Bård Natvig Norway 27 1.5k 1.0× 449 0.8× 210 0.5× 665 1.7× 115 0.3× 68 2.6k
Janet K. Freburger United States 25 643 0.4× 300 0.5× 254 0.6× 193 0.5× 233 0.6× 72 1.8k
P Croft United Kingdom 16 1.5k 1.0× 205 0.4× 214 0.5× 450 1.1× 271 0.7× 25 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Annette Bishop

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annette Bishop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annette Bishop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annette Bishop more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annette Bishop

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annette Bishop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annette Bishop. The network helps show where Annette Bishop may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annette Bishop

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annette Bishop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annette Bishop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annette Bishop. Annette Bishop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wood, Lianne, Annette Bishop, Martyn Lewis, et al.. (2021). Treatment targets of exercise for persistent non-specific low back pain: a consensus study. Physiotherapy. 112. 78–86. 12 indexed citations
2.
Moffatt, Fiona, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of the First Contact Physiotherapy (FCP) model of primary care: a qualitative insight. Physiotherapy. 113. 209–216. 24 indexed citations
4.
Babatunde, Opeyemi, Annette Bishop, Elizabeth Cottrell, et al.. (2020). A systematic review and evidence synthesis of non-medical triage, self-referral and direct access services for patients with musculoskeletal pain. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0235364–e0235364. 54 indexed citations
5.
Taylor, Stephanie & Annette Bishop. (2019). Patient and public beliefs about the role of imaging in the management of non-specific low back pain: a scoping review. Physiotherapy. 107. 224–233. 18 indexed citations
6.
Draper‐Rodi, Jerry, Steven Vogel, & Annette Bishop. (2018). Design and development of an e-learning programme: An illustrative commentary. International journal of osteopathic medicine. 29. 36–40. 6 indexed citations
7.
Draper‐Rodi, Jerry, Steven Vogel, & Annette Bishop. (2018). Identification of prognostic factors and assessment methods on the evaluation of non-specific low back pain in a biopsychosocial environment: A scoping review. International journal of osteopathic medicine. 30. 25–34. 15 indexed citations
8.
Holden, Melanie, et al.. (2018). Defining adherence to therapeutic exercise for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 54(6). 326–331. 81 indexed citations
11.
Bishop, Annette, Reuben Ogollah, Bernadette Bartlam, et al.. (2016). Evaluating acupuncture and standard care for pregnant women with back pain: the EASE Back pilot randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN49955124). Pilot and Feasibility Studies. 2(1). 72–72. 19 indexed citations
12.
Hollinghurst, Sandra, Joanna Coast, John Busby, et al.. (2013). A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of ‘PhysioDirect’ telephone assessment and advice services for patients with musculoskeletal problems: economic evaluation. BMJ Open. 3(10). e003406–e003406. 19 indexed citations
13.
Müller, Sara, et al.. (2012). There is no association between a measure of clinical care and the response rate of GPs to postal surveys: A methodological study. European Journal of General Practice. 18(3). 154–158. 4 indexed citations
14.
Salisbury, Chris, Nadine E. Foster, Annette Bishop, et al.. (2012). THE MRC PHYSIODIRECT TRIAL: A PRAGMATIC RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PHYSIODIRECT TELEPHONE ASSESSMENT AND ADVICE SERVICES VERSUS USUAL CARE FOR MUSCULOSKELETAL PROBLEMS. Lara D. Veeken. 51. 36–36. 3 indexed citations
15.
Hendrick, Paul, Ramakrishnan Mani, Annette Bishop, Stephan Milosavljevic, & Anthony G. Schneiders. (2012). Therapist knowledge, adherence and use of low back pain guidelines to inform clinical decisions – A national survey of manipulative and sports physiotherapists in New Zealand. Manual Therapy. 18(2). 136–142. 55 indexed citations
16.
Salisbury, Chris, Nadine E. Foster, Annette Bishop, et al.. (2009). 'PhysioDirect' telephone assessment and advice services for physiotherapy: protocol for a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Services Research. 9(1). 136–136. 18 indexed citations
17.
Foster, Nadine E., Annette Bishop, Elaine Thomas, et al.. (2008). Illness perceptions of low back pain patients in primary care: What are they, do they change and are they associated with outcome?. Pain. 136(1). 177–187. 222 indexed citations
19.
May, Stephen, Chris Littlewood, & Annette Bishop. (2006). Reliability of procedures used in the physical examination of non-specific low back pain: A systematic review. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 52(2). 91–102. 115 indexed citations
20.
Bishop, Annette. (1991). Vision screening of children: a review of methods and personnel involved within the UK. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics. 11(1). 3–9. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026