Leda Blackwood

1.3k total citations
38 papers, 799 citations indexed

About

Leda Blackwood is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Leda Blackwood has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 799 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Leda Blackwood's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers). Leda Blackwood is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Labor Movements and Unions (4 papers). Leda Blackwood collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Netherlands. Leda Blackwood's co-authors include Nick Hopkins, Winnifred R. Louis, Steve Reicher, Emma F. Thomas, Stephen Reicher, Annayah Miranda Beatrice Prosser, Catherine E. Amiot, George Lafferty, Laura G. E. Smith and Tim Kurz and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Nature Climate Change and Frontiers in Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Leda Blackwood

37 papers receiving 728 citations

Peers

Leda Blackwood
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Sociology and Political Science 552
  • Social Psychology 188
  • Political Science and International Relations 102
  • Education 100
  • Gender Studies 89
Replace Annick Prieur with:
Annick Prieur Denmark
Michael Loewy United States
Belinda Robnett United States
Ruth Ditlmann United States
Michael Windzio Germany
Eva Jaspers Netherlands
Sune Qvotrup Jensen Denmark
Daphne Holden United States
M. Reza Nakhaie Canada
Nicholas Faulkner Australia
Annick Prieur Denmark View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Leda Blackwood
Leda Blackwood · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Leda Blackwood
Leda Blackwood · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Leda Blackwood

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Leda Blackwood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leda Blackwood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leda Blackwood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Leda Blackwood

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leda Blackwood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leda Blackwood. The network helps show where Leda Blackwood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leda Blackwood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leda Blackwood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leda Blackwood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Leda Blackwood. Leda Blackwood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 6
3 4
4 1
5 3
6 1
7 2
8 5
9 18
10 2
11 7
12 8
13 68
14 9
15 26
16 79
17 87
18 16
19
Believing is not enough: Predicting support for the NTEU on an Australian campus
1
20
The Opposite of Choice: New Technologies and New Markets in Australian Education.
2

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026