Laura G. E. Smith

64 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Laura G. E. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Communication 289
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 411
  • Social Psychology 422
  • Sociology and Political Science 867
  • Clinical Psychology 367
Replace Carey S. Ryan with:
Carey S. Ryan United States
Arne Roets Belgium
Oksana Yakushko United States
Marilyn Campbell Australia
Fiona A. White Australia
Norbert Vanbeselaere Belgium
Philipp Alexander Freund Germany
Jessica Vera-Bermudez Spain
Tamera R. Schneider United States
Paul H. White United States
Laura G. E. Smith relative to Carey S. Ryan United States Carey S. Ryan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Carey S. Ryan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Laura G. E. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Laura G. E. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Laura G. E. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Laura G. E. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Laura G. E. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Laura G. E. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Laura G. E. Smith. The network helps show where Laura G. E. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Laura G. E. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Laura G. E. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Laura G. E. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20241
3 20241
4 202412
5 20242
6 202414
7 20240
8 20232
9 20232
10 202071
11 20175
12 201632
13 201516
14 20142
15
A history of materials and practices for wound management
201250
16 201221
17 201129
18 201132
19
Nice and Nasty: The Formation of Prosocial and Hostile Social Movements
201019
20 201022

About Laura G. E. Smith

Laura G. E. Smith is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology, Health Informatics, Sociology and Political Science and Applied Psychology, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (22 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (11 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (5 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (4 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (4 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (289 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (411 citations), Social Psychology (422 citations), Sociology and Political Science (867 citations) and Clinical Psychology (367 citations). Laura G. E. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Emma F. Thomas, Kate Cooper, Ailsa Russell, Craig McGarty, Tom Postmes, Ana‐Maria Bliuc, Joanne R. Smith, Catherine E. Amiot, Victor J. Callan and Girish Lala. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Social Psychology, British Journal of Social Psychology, Political Psychology, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations and Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026