Emma F. Thomas
- Sociology and Political Science top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 0.5%
- Communication top 1%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Craig McGartyKenneth I. MavorWinnifred R. LouisLaura G. E. SmithAna‐Maria BliucGirish LalaCatherine E. AmiotRenata Bongiorno
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (57 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (24 papers)Social Media and Politics (11 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPsychological ScienceNature Climate Change
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Emma F. Thomas
84 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
- Sociology and Political Science 2.7k
- Social Psychology 1.3k
- Communication 548
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 350
- Cognitive Neuroscience 298
Countries citing papers authored by Emma F. Thomas
This map shows the geographic impact of Emma F. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma F. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma F. Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Emma F. Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma F. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma F. Thomas. The network helps show where Emma F. Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emma F. Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emma F. Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emma F. Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emma F. Thomas. Emma F. Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 106 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | Nice and Nasty: The Formation of Prosocial and Hostile Social Movements | 19 |
| 20 | The role of social identity in creating positive beliefs and emotions to motivate volunteerism | 14 |
About Emma F. Thomas
Emma F. Thomas is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Communication, having authored 91 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (57 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (24 papers) and Social Media and Politics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (548 citations), Social Psychology (1.3k citations) and Sociology and Political Science (2.7k citations). Emma F. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Craig McGarty, Kenneth I. Mavor, Winnifred R. Louis, Laura G. E. Smith, Ana‐Maria Bliuc, Girish Lala, Catherine E. Amiot, Renata Bongiorno, Mariëtte Berndsen and Morgana Lizzio‐Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Science and Nature Climate Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.