Ruth Ditlmann

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
19 papers, 854 citations indexed

About

Ruth Ditlmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth Ditlmann has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 854 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Ruth Ditlmann's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (4 papers). Ruth Ditlmann is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (10 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research (4 papers). Ruth Ditlmann collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Israel. Ruth Ditlmann's co-authors include Valerie Purdie‐Vaughns, Claude M. Steele, Paul Davies, Jennifer Randall Crosby, Paul Lagunes, John F. Dovidio, Agata Gluszek, Melissa‐Sue John, Cyrus Samii and Johannes Kopf‐Beck and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Management Science.

In The Last Decade

Ruth Ditlmann

17 papers receiving 807 citations

Hit Papers

Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal ... 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth Ditlmann United States 10 614 245 245 122 94 19 854
Loes Meeussen Belgium 18 500 0.8× 231 0.9× 268 1.1× 181 1.5× 109 1.2× 29 883
Jennifer Randall Crosby United States 8 496 0.8× 264 1.1× 272 1.1× 114 0.9× 98 1.0× 9 730
Yolanda Flores Niemann United States 18 623 1.0× 370 1.5× 273 1.1× 273 2.2× 55 0.6× 28 1.0k
Ramaswami Mahalingam United States 20 575 0.9× 275 1.1× 145 0.6× 118 1.0× 46 0.5× 43 949
Allison J. Pugh United States 12 565 0.9× 105 0.4× 172 0.7× 103 0.8× 50 0.5× 29 819
Jean Lau Chin United States 16 283 0.5× 237 1.0× 269 1.1× 144 1.2× 147 1.6× 41 806
Soledad de Lemus Spain 20 749 1.2× 394 1.6× 539 2.2× 62 0.5× 29 0.3× 54 1.2k
April Brayfield United States 9 670 1.1× 307 1.3× 383 1.6× 246 2.0× 82 0.9× 16 1.1k
Julie Ann McMullin Canada 18 813 1.3× 204 0.8× 169 0.7× 57 0.5× 50 0.5× 32 1.3k
Alyssa Croft United States 14 417 0.7× 212 0.9× 387 1.6× 75 0.6× 40 0.4× 28 768

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Ditlmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Ditlmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Ditlmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Ditlmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Ditlmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Ditlmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Ditlmann. The network helps show where Ruth Ditlmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth Ditlmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth Ditlmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth Ditlmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth Ditlmann. Ruth Ditlmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Ditlmann, Ruth, et al.. (2025). Authorities impact intergroup contact intentions. Political Psychology. 46(6). 1700–1718. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ditlmann, Ruth, et al.. (2024). Estimating the effect of intergroup contact over years: evidence from a youth program in Israel. Political Science Research and Methods. 12(3). 475–493. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ditlmann, Ruth, et al.. (2024). From the lab to the field and back: the effects of need satisfaction on reconciliation among Germans and Israelis. Frontiers in Psychology. 15. 1243158–1243158.
5.
Barron, Kai, et al.. (2024). Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment. Management Science. 71(2). 1600–1622. 4 indexed citations
6.
Ditlmann, Ruth, et al.. (2023). Commemorating local victims of past atrocities and far-right support over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 120(28). e2221158120–e2221158120. 9 indexed citations
7.
Barron, Kai, et al.. (2022). Explicit and Implicit Belief-Based Gender Discrimination: A Hiring Experiment. SSRN Electronic Journal. 14 indexed citations
8.
Dancygier, Rafaela, et al.. (2020). National Penalties Reversed: The Local Politics of Citizenship and Politician Responsiveness to Immigrants. The Journal of Politics. 83(3). 867–883. 7 indexed citations
9.
Ditlmann, Ruth & Johannes Kopf‐Beck. (2019). The meaning of being German: An inductive approach to national identity. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 7(1). 423–447. 26 indexed citations
10.
Ditlmann, Ruth, Cyrus Samii, & Thomas Zeitzoff. (2017). Addressing Violent Intergroup Conflict from the Bottom Up?. OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin). 11(1). 38–77. 21 indexed citations
11.
Ditlmann, Ruth, et al.. (2016). The implicit power motive in intergroup dialogues about the history of slavery.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 112(1). 116–135. 18 indexed citations
12.
Ditlmann, Ruth & Cyrus Samii. (2016). Can intergroup contact affect ingroup dynamics? Insights from a field study with Jewish and Arab-Palestinian youth in Israel.. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology. 22(4). 380–392. 29 indexed citations
13.
Ditlmann, Ruth, et al.. (2014). Organizational and Individual Colorblindness Approaches to Past Injustice. 123–148. 1 indexed citations
14.
Ditlmann, Ruth & Paul Lagunes. (2013). The (Identification) Cards You Are Dealt: Biased Treatment ofAnglos andLatinos Using Municipal‐Issued versus UnofficialIDCards. Political Psychology. 35(4). 539–555. 9 indexed citations
15.
Lagunes, Paul, et al.. (2012). Documenting the Undocumented: A Review of the United States' First Municipal ID Program. Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University). 1 indexed citations
16.
Purdie‐Vaughns, Valerie & Ruth Ditlmann. (2010). Reflection on Diversity Science in Social Psychology. Psychological Inquiry. 21(2). 153–159. 8 indexed citations
17.
Ditlmann, Ruth, Valerie Purdie‐Vaughns, & Richard P. Eibach. (2010). Heritage- and ideology-based national identities and their implications for immigrant citizen relations in the United States and in Germany. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 35(4). 395–405. 40 indexed citations
18.
Dovidio, John F., Agata Gluszek, Melissa‐Sue John, Ruth Ditlmann, & Paul Lagunes. (2010). Understanding Bias toward Latinos: Discrimination, Dimensions of Difference, and Experience of Exclusion. Journal of Social Issues. 66(1). 59–78. 119 indexed citations
19.
Purdie‐Vaughns, Valerie, Claude M. Steele, Paul Davies, Ruth Ditlmann, & Jennifer Randall Crosby. (2008). Social identity contingencies: How diversity cues signal threat or safety for African Americans in mainstream institutions.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 94(4). 615–630. 545 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026